Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 1346936

Summary: Add plan for Trove deprecation and removal from RHOSP to OSP 9 Release Notes.
Product: Red Hat OpenStack Reporter: Rob Young <royoung>
Component: openstack-troveAssignee: Victoria Martinez de la Cruz <vimartin>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Luigi Toscano <ltoscano>
Severity: high Docs Contact: Don Domingo <ddomingo>
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 9.0 (Mitaka)CC: adahms, apevec, ddomingo, egafford, gprocunier, jjoyce, lhh, mburns, royoung, sclewis, srevivo, vimartin
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Documentation, Triaged
Target Release: 9.0 (Mitaka)   
Hardware: All   
OS: All   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Deprecated Functionality
Doc Text:
Based on customer feedback, support for a commercially available database is an absolute must for an enterprise cloud. As such, we have decided to concentrate our effort in building successful partnerships to meet this demand rather than building a fully open-source solution that might not benefit many of our customers. In line with this, the OpenStack Trove service (which has been a Technology Preview feature so far) will no longer be included in Red Hat OpenStack Platform 10 and up. Instead, we are working with a trusted partner to provide customers with a production-ready DBaaS service. Please contact your sales account manager to learn more about this option.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-10-19 18:26:00 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Rob Young 2016-06-15 16:47:38 UTC
Description of problem:

Add the following content to the OSP 9 Release Notes:

The Trove DBaaS component tech preview will be deprecated beginning in RHOSP 9. All Trove DBaaS components and supporting documentation will be removed in RHOSP 10.

Comment 2 Rob Young 2016-06-17 14:44:08 UTC
(In reply to Rob Young from comment #0)
> Description of problem:
> 
> Add the following content to the OSP 9 Release Notes:
> 
> The Trove DBaaS component tech preview will be deprecated beginning in RHOSP
> 9. All Trove DBaaS components and supporting documentation will be removed
> in RHOSP 10.

Please use the following content in the OSP 9 and 10 readme files.

DEPRECATION NOTICE: Based on ​customer feedback, and the constant message that support for commercially available database was an absolute must from the quasi totality of the customers we surveyed, we have came to the conclusion that we should rather concentrate our effort in having succesful partnerships around Trove rather than building a fully open-source solution that will not benefit our customers.
​
Beginning in RHOSP 10, ​the OpenStack Trove service, which has been in Tech Preview so far, will no longer be included in the RHOSP distribution. We are working with a trusted partner to provide our customers with a production ready DBaaS service. Please contact your sales account manager to learn more about this option.”

Comment 3 Elise Gafford 2016-07-28 16:28:59 UTC
Hi Don,

Rob's written deprecation text above. What is the process from here to get this into the release notes?

Comment 4 Don Domingo 2016-07-29 04:13:46 UTC
Hi Elise,

It's already on our radar. :-) 

Setting requires_release_notes? and rhos-9.0 flags, along with draft text in the Doc_Text field queues it up for processing in the release notes. Adding Andrew Dahms to see if we need to make it more prominent there; at present our toolchain will automatically pull in the text and put it in the "Deprecated Functionality" section (Doc Type).

Comment 10 Luigi Toscano 2017-08-22 15:57:42 UTC
Do we need to do anything else for this bug?

Comment 14 Greg Procunier 2018-08-23 20:16:23 UTC
Given that Tesora (The "partner") was bought by Stratoscale and they seem to have zero interest in openstack, where does that leave those of us who need DBaaS from their private cloud?

Comment 15 Red Hat Bugzilla 2023-09-14 03:26:56 UTC
The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 1000 days