Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0. The upgrade date is tentatively scheduled for 2 December 2018, pending final testing and feedback.
Bug 1346936 - Add plan for Trove deprecation and removal from RHOSP to OSP 9 Release Notes. [NEEDINFO]
Add plan for Trove deprecation and removal from RHOSP to OSP 9 Release Notes.
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Product: Red Hat OpenStack
Classification: Red Hat
Component: openstack-trove (Show other bugs)
9.0 (Mitaka)
All All
unspecified Severity high
: ---
: 9.0 (Mitaka)
Assigned To: Victoria Martinez de la Cruz
Luigi Toscano
Don Domingo
: Documentation, Triaged
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2016-06-15 12:47 EDT by Rob Young
Modified: 2018-08-23 16:16 EDT (History)
12 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Deprecated Functionality
Doc Text:
Based on customer feedback, support for a commercially available database is an absolute must for an enterprise cloud. As such, we have decided to concentrate our effort in building successful partnerships to meet this demand rather than building a fully open-source solution that might not benefit many of our customers. In line with this, the OpenStack Trove service (which has been a Technology Preview feature so far) will no longer be included in Red Hat OpenStack Platform 10 and up. Instead, we are working with a trusted partner to provide customers with a production-ready DBaaS service. Please contact your sales account manager to learn more about this option.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-10-19 14:26:00 EDT
Type: Bug
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---
gprocunier: needinfo? (royoung)


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Rob Young 2016-06-15 12:47:38 EDT
Description of problem:

Add the following content to the OSP 9 Release Notes:

The Trove DBaaS component tech preview will be deprecated beginning in RHOSP 9. All Trove DBaaS components and supporting documentation will be removed in RHOSP 10.
Comment 2 Rob Young 2016-06-17 10:44:08 EDT
(In reply to Rob Young from comment #0)
> Description of problem:
> 
> Add the following content to the OSP 9 Release Notes:
> 
> The Trove DBaaS component tech preview will be deprecated beginning in RHOSP
> 9. All Trove DBaaS components and supporting documentation will be removed
> in RHOSP 10.

Please use the following content in the OSP 9 and 10 readme files.

DEPRECATION NOTICE: Based on ​customer feedback, and the constant message that support for commercially available database was an absolute must from the quasi totality of the customers we surveyed, we have came to the conclusion that we should rather concentrate our effort in having succesful partnerships around Trove rather than building a fully open-source solution that will not benefit our customers.
​
Beginning in RHOSP 10, ​the OpenStack Trove service, which has been in Tech Preview so far, will no longer be included in the RHOSP distribution. We are working with a trusted partner to provide our customers with a production ready DBaaS service. Please contact your sales account manager to learn more about this option.”
Comment 3 Elise Gafford 2016-07-28 12:28:59 EDT
Hi Don,

Rob's written deprecation text above. What is the process from here to get this into the release notes?
Comment 4 Don Domingo 2016-07-29 00:13:46 EDT
Hi Elise,

It's already on our radar. :-) 

Setting requires_release_notes? and rhos-9.0 flags, along with draft text in the Doc_Text field queues it up for processing in the release notes. Adding Andrew Dahms to see if we need to make it more prominent there; at present our toolchain will automatically pull in the text and put it in the "Deprecated Functionality" section (Doc Type).
Comment 10 Luigi Toscano 2017-08-22 11:57:42 EDT
Do we need to do anything else for this bug?
Comment 14 Greg Procunier 2018-08-23 16:16:23 EDT
Given that Tesora (The "partner") was bought by Stratoscale and they seem to have zero interest in openstack, where does that leave those of us who need DBaaS from their private cloud?

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.