Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0. The upgrade date is tentatively scheduled for 2 December 2018, pending final testing and feedback.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.
Bug 1346953 - [RFE] Unable to set number_of_vms in non-generic service catalog items
[RFE] Unable to set number_of_vms in non-generic service catalog items
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Product: Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Automate (Show other bugs)
5.5.0
All All
high Severity high
: GA
: 5.6.2
Assigned To: mkanoor
Milan Falešník
automate:catalog
: FutureFeature, ZStream
Depends On: 1331867
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2016-06-15 13:45 EDT by John Prause
Modified: 2016-10-04 10:27 EDT (History)
16 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version: 5.6.2.0
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
This update adds the ability to set the number_of_vms variable for vendor-specific service catalog items. This minimizes the need to maintain custom build request methods, as the built-in create_provision_request method can be more easily used when provisioning virtual machines.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 1331867
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-10-04 10:27:12 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: Unknown

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)


External Trackers
Tracker ID Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2016:1996 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Important: CFME 4.1 bug fixes and enhancement update 2016-10-04 14:26:13 EDT

  None (edit)
Comment 3 Greg McCullough 2016-09-08 13:49:17 EDT 
Backported in PR https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq/pull/11108
Comment 4 Milan Falešník 2016-09-15 11:23:03 EDT 
Verifeid in 5.6.2.0

I tried to have a dialog with number_of_vms field and I tried it on a service item and service bundle and the number of vms specified in there was honoured.
Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2016-10-04 10:27:12 EDT 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1996.html
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.