Bug 1347025 - Split up the "ceph" package into four new packages
Summary: Split up the "ceph" package into four new packages
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Ceph Storage
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: Build
Version: 2.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
low
Target Milestone: rc
: 2.0
Assignee: Ken Dreyer (Red Hat)
QA Contact: Tejas
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-06-15 20:16 UTC by Ali Maredia
Modified: 2016-08-23 19:41 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-08-23 19:41:49 UTC
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Ceph Project Bug Tracker 10587 0 None None None 2016-06-15 20:16:37 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2016:1755 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Red Hat Ceph Storage 2.0 bug fix and enhancement update 2016-08-23 23:23:52 UTC

Description Ali Maredia 2016-06-15 20:16:37 UTC 
debian/rpm: split mon/osd/mds server packages

Split up the "ceph" package into four new packages:

1. ceph-mon
2. ceph-osd
3. ceph-mds
4. ceph-base (files shared among multiple servers)

and then:

5. Make "ceph" into a metapackage that depends on both -mon and -osd
    (and -mds, for RPMs).

To describe the outcome of this change another way:

For RPMs:
  - "ceph-{mon,osd,mds}" Require: ceph-base.
  - "ceph" will become a metapackage that Requires: ceph-{mon,osd,mds}.

For DEBs:
  - "ceph-{mon,osd,mds}" will Depends: ceph-base.
  - "ceph" will become a metapackage that Depends: ceph-{mon,osd}.
  - "ceph" will continue to Recommends: ceph-mds

New users should "yum install ceph-mon" or "yum install ceph-osd" (or
"apt-get install ceph-mon", etc) in order to install the exact daemons
that they need.
Comment 10 Tejas 2016-07-04 13:05:47 UTC 
Verified in build :
 ceph-10.2.2-9.el7cp

Moving to verified
Comment 12 errata-xmlrpc 2016-08-23 19:41:49 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-1755.html
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.