Description of problem: Run `flatpak --user update` Version-Release number of selected component: flatpak-0.6.4-1.fc24 Additional info: reporter: libreport-2.7.1 backtrace_rating: 4 cmdline: flatpak --user update crash_function: mkdir_p_at_internal executable: /usr/bin/flatpak global_pid: 12145 kernel: 4.5.6-300.fc24.x86_64 pkg_fingerprint: 73BD E983 81B4 6521 pkg_vendor: Fedora Project reproducible: Not sure how to reproduce the problem runlevel: N 5 type: CCpp uid: 1000 Truncated backtrace: Thread no. 1 (10 frames) #4 mkdir_p_at_internal at libglnx/glnx-shutil.c:215 #5 glnx_shutil_mkdir_p_at at libglnx/glnx-shutil.c:281 #6 _ostree_repo_cache_summary at src/libostree/ostree-repo-pull.c:1854 #7 ostree_repo_pull_with_options at src/libostree/ostree-repo-pull.c:2187 #8 ostree_repo_pull_one_dir at src/libostree/ostree-repo-pull.c:1773 #9 ostree_repo_pull at src/libostree/ostree-repo-pull.c:1747 #10 flatpak_dir_pull at common/flatpak-dir.c:1244 #11 flatpak_dir_update at common/flatpak-dir.c:3118 #12 do_update at app/flatpak-builtins-update.c:89 #13 flatpak_builtin_update at app/flatpak-builtins-update.c:160
Created attachment 1168733 [details] File: backtrace
Created attachment 1168734 [details] File: cgroup
Created attachment 1168735 [details] File: core_backtrace
Created attachment 1168736 [details] File: dso_list
Created attachment 1168737 [details] File: environ
Created attachment 1168738 [details] File: limits
Created attachment 1168739 [details] File: maps
Created attachment 1168740 [details] File: mountinfo
Created attachment 1168741 [details] File: namespaces
Created attachment 1168742 [details] File: open_fds
Created attachment 1168743 [details] File: proc_pid_status
Created attachment 1168744 [details] File: var_log_messages
For the record - second attempt of the same command succeeded without problems.
Similar problem has been detected: $ flatpak --user update Output: Updating application org.libreoffice.LibreOffice fresh 1 metadata, 0 content objects fetched; 569 B transferred in 1 seconds ** OSTree:ERROR:libglnx/glnx-shutil.c:215:mkdir_p_at_internal: assertion failed: (lastslash != NULL) Aborted (core dumped) This seems only to happen with libreoffice exclusively (at least with my configuration). reporter: libreport-2.7.2 backtrace_rating: 4 cmdline: flatpak --user update crash_function: mkdir_p_at_internal executable: /usr/bin/flatpak global_pid: 4865 kernel: 4.6.4-301.fc24.x86_64 package: flatpak-0.6.7-1.fc24 pkg_fingerprint: 73BD E983 81B4 6521 pkg_vendor: Fedora Project reason: flatpak killed by SIGABRT runlevel: N 5 type: CCpp uid: 1001
Raising priority as it's quite blocking real flatpak usage.
This is the issue: Its trying to mkdirat (6, "summary") and getting ENOENT This is due to: 6:/home/akurtakov/.local/share/flatpak/repo/tmp/cache (deleted) pos: 0 flags: 02304000 mnt_id: 80 But why oh why is that directory deleted?
This is an ostree issue: https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/pull/476
ostree-2016.7-2.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-4b3c8e53d5
ostree-2016.7-2.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-cf0fd9b0ad
ostree-2016.7-2.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-e5f8e5e4ab
ostree-2016.7-2.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-cf0fd9b0ad
ostree-2016.7-2.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
ostree-2016.7-2.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
ostree-2016.7-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.