Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Bug 1347735

Summary: libreswan needs to check additional CRLs after LDAP CRL distributionpoint fails
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Reporter: Paul Wouters <pwouters>
Component: libreswanAssignee: Paul Wouters <pwouters>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Jaroslav Aster <jaster>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact: Mirek Jahoda <mjahoda>
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 7.4CC: jaster, kengert, omoris
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Cause: Only the first CRLdistributionpoint was checked Consequence: If there are more than one CRLdistributionpoints listed in the certificate, and the first CRLdistributionpoint was down, the second CRLdistributionpoint was never checked Fix: process all CRLdistributionpoints Result: if only one of a set of CRLdistributionpoints is down, libreswan can now properly still fetch the CRL.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
: 1360134 (view as bug list) Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-11-03 21:23:07 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
multi crldistribution fetch none

Description Paul Wouters 2016-06-17 13:47:08 UTC
Description of problem:

When multiple CRL distributionpoints are present in a certificate, and the ldap URI fails, libreswan does not attempt another URI like http.

I believe LDAP is always attempted first?

This is related to a missing feature in NSS:

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1280276

Comment 2 Kai Engert (:kaie) (inactive account) 2016-06-22 10:48:08 UTC
(In reply to Paul Wouters from comment #0)

> This is related to a missing feature in NSS:
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1280276

I have triaged and commented in the upstream bug.

NSS seems to already provide everything you need, see the explanations I wrote there.

Comment 4 Paul Wouters 2016-06-22 12:25:26 UTC
Created attachment 1170715 [details]
multi crldistribution fetch

patch ot fetch from multiple CRL points

Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2016-11-03 21:23:07 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2603.html