Bug 1348117 - Add new Cloud volume fails
Summary: Add new Cloud volume fails
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Providers
Version: 5.6.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
high
high
Target Milestone: GA
: 5.7.0
Assignee: Sam Lucidi
QA Contact: Ola Pavlenko
URL:
Whiteboard: openstack:cloud:volume:add
: 1349552 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks: 1348651
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-06-20 08:20 UTC by Ronnie Rasouli
Modified: 2017-08-30 03:48 UTC (History)
10 users (show)

Fixed In Version: 5.7.0.0
Doc Type: Known Issue
Doc Text:
Adding a new Red Hat OpenStack Platform volume in the Red Hat CloudForms user interface returns an 'Error' page. The user is not taken to the 'Volumes' menu as expected.
Clone Of:
: 1348651 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-01-11 20:08:39 UTC
Category: ---
Cloudforms Team: ---
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
evm log (155.46 KB, application/x-gzip)
2016-06-20 08:20 UTC, Ronnie Rasouli
no flags Details

Description Ronnie Rasouli 2016-06-20 08:20:58 UTC
Created attachment 1169747 [details]
evm log

Description of problem:

Adding new volume in CFME ui show by url 

https://panther09.qa.lab.tlv.redhat.com/cloud_volume/show_list
""
Unexpected error encountered
undefined method `sub_table' for nil:NilClass [cloud_volume/button]
""

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
5.6.0.11

How reproducible:
100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1. add new cloud provider of RHOS7 to CFME UI
2. go to compute --> cloud --> volumes 
3. click on configuration button --> add new cloud volume 

Actual results:

Error page

Expected results:

Cloud volume menu appears

Additional info:

Comment 3 Tzu-Mainn Chen 2016-06-21 13:41:18 UTC
Sam, could you take a look into this one?  Thanks!

Comment 4 Sam Lucidi 2016-06-21 15:37:06 UTC
https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq/pull/9327

Comment 7 Jan Krocil 2016-06-24 14:55:23 UTC
*** Bug 1349552 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 9 Ronnie Rasouli 2016-10-05 08:56:19 UTC
verified on 5.7.0.3


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.