Spec URL: https://jcline.fedorapeople.org/python-pkginfo.spec SRPM URL: https://jcline.fedorapeople.org/python-pkginfo-1.3.2-1.fc25.src.rpm Description: This package provides an API for querying the distutils metadata written in the PKG-INFO file inside a source distriubtion (an sdist) or a binary distribution (e.g., created by running bdist_egg). It can also query the EGG-INFO directory of an installed distribution, and the *.egg-info stored in a "development checkout" (e.g, created by running setup.py develop). Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=14606458 FAS Name: jcline
Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: ======= - Binary eggs must be removed in %prep Note: Binary egg files not removed in %prep: ./docs/examples/nopkginfo-0.1.egg ./docs/examples/mypackage-0.1-py2.6.egg See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#Packaging_eggs_and_setuptools_concerns ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [-]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated". 38 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/pcreech17/1349026-python- pkginfo/licensecheck.txt [-]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 4 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Python: [x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. [x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python [x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in python2-pkginfo , python3-pkginfo , python-pkginfo-doc [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified. [ ]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [-]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Uses parallel make %{?_smp_mflags} macro. [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: python2-pkginfo-1.3.2-1.fc25.noarch.rpm python3-pkginfo-1.3.2-1.fc25.noarch.rpm python-pkginfo-doc-1.3.2-1.fc25.noarch.rpm python-pkginfo-1.3.2-1.fc25.src.rpm python2-pkginfo.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) metadata -> meta data, meta-data, metatarsal python2-pkginfo.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) sdists -> sadists, dist python2-pkginfo.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) bdists -> sadists python2-pkginfo.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US distutils -> distillates python2-pkginfo.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US metadata -> meta data, meta-data, metatarsal python2-pkginfo.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US distriubtion -> distribution, distortion python2-pkginfo.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US sdist -> dist, sadist, s dist python2-pkginfo.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US bdist -> dist, b dist python2-pkginfo.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US py -> pt, p, y python2-pkginfo.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary pkginfo-2 python2-pkginfo.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary pkginfo python2-pkginfo.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary pkginfo-2.7 python3-pkginfo.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) metadata -> meta data, meta-data, metatarsal python3-pkginfo.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) sdists -> sadists, dist python3-pkginfo.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) bdists -> sadists python3-pkginfo.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US distutils -> distillates python3-pkginfo.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US metadata -> meta data, meta-data, metatarsal python3-pkginfo.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US distriubtion -> distribution, distortion python3-pkginfo.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US sdist -> dist, sadist, s dist python3-pkginfo.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US bdist -> dist, b dist python3-pkginfo.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US py -> pt, p, y python3-pkginfo.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary pkginfo-3.4 python3-pkginfo.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary pkginfo-3 python-pkginfo-doc.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US distutils -> distillates python-pkginfo-doc.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US metadata -> meta data, meta-data, metatarsal python-pkginfo-doc.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US distriubtion -> distribution, distortion python-pkginfo-doc.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US sdist -> dist, sadist, s dist python-pkginfo-doc.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US bdist -> dist, b dist python-pkginfo-doc.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US py -> pt, p, y python-pkginfo.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) metadata -> meta data, meta-data, metatarsal python-pkginfo.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) sdists -> sadists, dist python-pkginfo.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) bdists -> sadists python-pkginfo.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US distutils -> distillates python-pkginfo.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US metadata -> meta data, meta-data, metatarsal python-pkginfo.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US distriubtion -> distribution, distortion python-pkginfo.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US sdist -> dist, sadist, s dist python-pkginfo.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US bdist -> dist, b dist python-pkginfo.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US py -> pt, p, y 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 38 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- Cannot parse rpmlint output: Requires -------- python3-pkginfo (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /usr/bin/python3 python(abi) python3-setuptools python-pkginfo-doc (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): python2-pkginfo (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /usr/bin/python2 python(abi) python2-setuptools Provides -------- python3-pkginfo: python3-pkginfo python-pkginfo-doc: python-pkginfo-doc python2-pkginfo: python-pkginfo python2-pkginfo Source checksums ---------------- https://pypi.python.org/packages/bc/3e/046ec2439e233161f99d2f6cceb1ac49176612b6f6250cd6cb9919cda97a/pkginfo-1.3.2.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : f87835fd53824edcead4cb83290477b97c4138e4cceac1a092bb5f5007d6e461 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : f87835fd53824edcead4cb83290477b97c4138e4cceac1a092bb5f5007d6e461 Generated by fedora-review 0.6.1 (f03e4e7) last change: 2016-05-02 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1349026 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Python, Generic, Shell-api Disabled plugins: Java, C/C++, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R, PHP Disabled flags: EXARCH, DISTTAG, EPEL5, BATCH, EPEL6 APPROVED
Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-pkginfo
python-pkginfo-1.3.2-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-208faf8ecd
python-pkginfo-1.3.2-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-b2b90a1931
python-pkginfo-1.3.2-1.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-8878f72f38
python-pkginfo-1.3.2-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-8878f72f38
python-pkginfo-1.3.2-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-208faf8ecd
python-pkginfo-1.3.2-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-b2b90a1931
python-pkginfo-1.3.2-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
python-pkginfo-1.3.2-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
python-pkginfo-1.3.2-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.