Bug 1349116 - RBD with object-map enabled results in poor performance with discard
Summary: RBD with object-map enabled results in poor performance with discard
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Ceph Storage
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: RBD
Version: 2.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Linux
high
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: 2.1
Assignee: Jason Dillaman
QA Contact: Rachana Patel
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-06-22 17:54 UTC by bandrus
Modified: 2017-07-30 15:26 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version: RHEL: ceph-10.2.3-2.el7cp Ubuntu: ceph_10.2.3-3redhat1xenial
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-11-22 19:27:11 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Ceph Project Bug Tracker 16689 0 None None None 2016-07-16 05:33:57 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2016:2815 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Moderate: Red Hat Ceph Storage security, bug fix, and enhancement update 2017-03-22 02:06:33 UTC

Description bandrus 2016-06-22 17:54:41 UTC
Technically this was tested in community 10.2.1/10.2.2, but the "problem" likely exists in downstream as well as no references to this issue have been found other than another reported instance in the community mailing list.

Description of problem:
An RBD with the object-map feature enabled will experience extremely poor performance with discard operations.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Jewel

How reproducible:
100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Attempt to create a filesystem on an RBD device that has object-map enabled

Actual results:
Takes approximately 21 seconds to complete on a 10G image

Expected results:
should take < .5s on a 10G image

Additional info:

Comment 3 Jason Dillaman 2016-07-18 18:15:17 UTC
Upstream, master branch PR: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10332

Comment 8 Rachana Patel 2016-10-31 16:36:16 UTC
working as expected.(not taking too much time) hence moving to verified

Comment 10 errata-xmlrpc 2016-11-22 19:27:11 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2815.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.