REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/14780 (cluster/tier: dont promote estimated block consumption > hi watermark) posted (#1) for review on master by Milind Changire (mchangir)
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/14780 (cluster/tier: dont promote estimated block consumption > hi watermark) posted (#2) for review on master by Milind Changire (mchangir)
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/14780 (cluster/tier: dont promote if estimated block consumption > hi watermark) posted (#3) for review on master by Milind Changire (mchangir)
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/14780 (cluster/tier: dont promote if estimated block consumption > hi watermark) posted (#4) for review on master by Milind Changire (mchangir)
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/14780 (cluster/tier: dont promote if estimated block consumption > hi watermark) posted (#5) for review on master by Milind Changire (mchangir)
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/14780 (cluster/tier: dont promote if estimated block consumption > hi watermark) posted (#6) for review on master by Milind Changire (mchangir)
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/14780 (cluster/tier: dont promote if estimated block consumption > hi watermark) posted (#7) for review on master by Milind Changire (mchangir)
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/14780 (cluster/tier: dont promote if estimated block consumption > hi watermark) posted (#8) for review on master by Milind Changire (mchangir)
upstream master patch : http://review.gluster.org/#/c/14780/
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/14780 (cluster/tier: dont promote if estimated block consumption > hi watermark) posted (#9) for review on master by Milind Changire (mchangir)
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/14780 (cluster/tier: dont promote if estimated block consumption > hi watermark) posted (#10) for review on master by Milind Changire (mchangir)
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/14780 (cluster/tier: dont promote if estimated block consumption > hi watermark) posted (#11) for review on master by Milind Changire (mchangir)
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/14780 (cluster/tier: dont promote if estimated block consumption > hi watermark) posted (#12) for review on master by Milind Changire (mchangir)
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/14780 (cluster/tier: dont promote if estimated block consumption > hi watermark) posted (#13) for review on master by Milind Changire (mchangir)
COMMIT: http://review.gluster.org/14780 committed in master by Dan Lambright (dlambrig) ------ commit 1f4e41e8c2f5f4af4564caba0a08996853f089f4 Author: Milind Changire <mchangir> Date: Thu Jun 23 12:37:51 2016 +0530 cluster/tier: dont promote if estimated block consumption > hi watermark Add test to fail promotion if estimated block consumption grows beyond hi watermark. Skip file migrations until next cycle if tier_get_fs_stat() fails in tier_migrate_using_query_file() Change-Id: Ice04572fa739c09109c4433e65965197482a7beb BUG: 1349284 Signed-off-by: Milind Changire <mchangir> Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/14780 Smoke: Gluster Build System <jenkins.org> CentOS-regression: Gluster Build System <jenkins.org> NetBSD-regression: NetBSD Build System <jenkins.org> Reviewed-by: mohammed rafi kc <rkavunga> Reviewed-by: Dan Lambright <dlambrig>
This bug is getting closed because a release has been made available that should address the reported issue. In case the problem is still not fixed with glusterfs-3.9.0, please open a new bug report. glusterfs-3.9.0 has been announced on the Gluster mailinglists [1], packages for several distributions should become available in the near future. Keep an eye on the Gluster Users mailinglist [2] and the update infrastructure for your distribution. [1] http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/2016-November/029281.html [2] https://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/