Bug 1349423 - Dynamic Dropdown list of AWS instance Type for AWS GovCloud seems to be returning instance types that are not supported by AWS GovCloud
Summary: Dynamic Dropdown list of AWS instance Type for AWS GovCloud seems to be retur...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Providers
Version: 5.5.0
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
high
high
Target Milestone: GA
: 5.6.2
Assignee: Marcel Hild
QA Contact: Jeff Teehan
URL:
Whiteboard: ui:ec2
Depends On: 1346065
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-06-23 12:41 UTC by John Prause
Modified: 2022-07-09 07:51 UTC (History)
16 users (show)

Fixed In Version: 5.6.2.0
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Previously, dynamic dropdown list of instance types for AWS GovCloud was returning instance types that are not supported by AWS GovCloud. This was because many of the instance type 'flavors' that are not actually available in AWS GovCloud (eg,m4.large) returned into VMDB which were presented in the dropdown list. This fix removed GovCloud from AWS list of regions which has resolved the issue.
Clone Of: 1346065
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-10-04 14:28:31 UTC
Category: ---
Cloudforms Team: AWS
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2016:1996 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Important: CFME 4.1 bug fixes and enhancement update 2016-10-04 18:26:13 UTC

Comment 3 Marcel Hild 2016-09-08 16:01:44 UTC
darga PR merged at https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq/pull/10902

Comment 4 Jeff Teehan 2016-09-26 20:08:59 UTC
This works as described as far as removing regions from the list.  Moving to verified.  This is what amazon says about it, so I guess we're in line with that.

The following table lists the regions provided by an AWS account. Note that you can't describe or access additional regions from an AWS account, such as AWS GovCloud (US) or China (Beijing).

Comment 5 Jeff Teehan 2016-09-26 22:37:15 UTC
I don't think we need a test case for this.

Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2016-10-04 14:28:31 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1996.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.