Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Bug 1349812

Summary: avc denial when starting LXC Container
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Reporter: Petr Sklenar <psklenar>
Component: selinux-policyAssignee: Lukas Vrabec <lvrabec>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Milos Malik <mmalik>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 7.3CC: dapospis, lvrabec, mgrepl, mmalik, plautrba, pvrabec, ssekidde, tpelka
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: Regression
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: selinux-policy-3.13.1-96.el7 Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-11-04 02:32:44 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Petr Sklenar 2016-06-24 10:30:50 UTC
Description of problem:
avc denial when starting LXC  Container

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
systemd-219-21.el7.x86_64
selinux-policy-3.13.1-76.el7.noarc

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. virsh --connect lxc:/// start bash

Actual results:
type=USER_AVC msg=audit(1466764069.123:566): pid=624 uid=81 auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 subj=system_u:system_r:system_dbusd_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 msg='avc:  denied  { 0x2 } for msgtype=method_return dest=:1.57 spid=2746 tpid=2817 scontext=system_u:system_r:systemd_machined_t:s0 tcontext=system_u:system_r:virtd_lxc_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 tclass=(null)  exe="/usr/bin/dbus-daemon" sauid=81 hostname=? addr=? terminal=?'
error: Failed to start domain bash
error: internal error: guest failed to start: Failure in libvirt_lxc startup: Did not receive a reply. Possible causes include: the remote application did not send a reply, the message bus security policy blocked the reply, the reply timeout expired, or the network connection was broken.


Expected results:
no denial 

Additional info:

Comment 5 David King 2016-08-24 08:54:23 UTC
If there is something to fix in dbus, please mention what it is. The numeric ID for the denial should be fixed with the changes in bug 1364485.

Comment 6 Lukas Vrabec 2016-08-24 10:25:10 UTC
We need to allow systemd_machined_t domain to communicate with lxc container via dbus.

Comment 10 errata-xmlrpc 2016-11-04 02:32:44 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-2283.html