Bug 1350875 - etcd adding new member fails
Summary: etcd adding new member fails
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Classification: Red Hat
Component: etcd
Version: 7.2
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
high
urgent
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Jan Chaloupka
QA Contact: atomic-bugs@redhat.com
Yoana Ruseva
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 1328482
Blocks: OSOPS_V3 1186913 1267746 1361733 1367035
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-06-28 14:56 UTC by Alexander Koksharov
Modified: 2019-12-16 06:00 UTC (History)
22 users (show)

Fixed In Version: etcd-2.3.7-4.el7
Doc Type: Known Issue
Doc Text:
The etcd packages have been upgraded to extend `etcdctl backup` command with options to reuse backup of previous etcd member.
Clone Of: 1328482
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-09-15 08:29:57 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2016:1828 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE etcd bug fix update 2016-09-15 11:56:11 UTC

Comment 44 Yoana Ruseva 2016-09-08 19:33:27 UTC 
Jan, is this a known issue that was fixed? The Doc Text looks like an enhancement. It is part of the erratum description at the moment:

https://errata.devel.redhat.com/errata/details/24502

If it really is a known issue still, I'll add it to the Known Issues in the Release Notes here:

https://access.qa.redhat.com/documentation/en/red-hat-enterprise-linux-atomic-host/7/single/release-notes/#known_issues
Comment 45 Jan Chaloupka 2016-09-09 12:02:19 UTC 
It is known issue and enhancement at the same time. However, as it already affects current customers and in some cases make the etcd unusable, it more classifies as known issue.
Comment 47 errata-xmlrpc 2016-09-15 08:29:57 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-1828.html
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.