RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1350952 - Firefox is unable to verify some certificates using TLS 1.2
Summary: Firefox is unable to verify some certificates using TLS 1.2
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 1343202
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Classification: Red Hat
Component: firefox
Version: 7.2
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Martin Stransky
QA Contact: Desktop QE
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-06-28 19:56 UTC by Nicolas Mitsis
Modified: 2016-06-29 12:13 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-06-29 12:13:37 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
screenshot of error (85.50 KB, image/png)
2016-06-28 19:56 UTC, Nicolas Mitsis
no flags Details
ssltap with tls 1.1 (6.68 KB, text/plain)
2016-06-28 19:58 UTC, Nicolas Mitsis
no flags Details
ssltap with tls 1.2 (6.86 KB, text/plain)
2016-06-28 19:59 UTC, Nicolas Mitsis
no flags Details

Description Nicolas Mitsis 2016-06-28 19:56:25 UTC
Created attachment 1173543 [details]
screenshot of error

Description of problem:

I've run in a weird issue with Firefox from rhel7.2 repositories (tested versions 38.7.0 to 45.2.0) where FF is unable to verify some certificates. Specifically https://code.jquery.com/ certificate (verified by GlobalSign nv-sa), see attached image.

The same site is verified by same versions of vanilla Firefox packages (running on rhel7.2) and openssl s_client.

How reproducible:

Go to https://code.jquery.com with Firefox 45.2.0-1 on RHEL7.2

Actual results:

Page does not open / no message is displayed in Firefox. Only message is seen by developer tools -> network tab which displays "The connection used to fetch this resource is insecure."

Additional info:

Using TLS 1.1 (setting security.tls.version.max to 2 in Firefox config) the page opens correctly. I've also attached to files produced by ssltap with TLS versions 1.1 & 1.2. 

The bug seems similar to bug #1234693 ( https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234693 ) which was resolved by RHSA-2015:1185-1 but I'm encountering this problem with firefox-45.2.0-1.el7_2.x86_64 and nss-3.21.0-9.el7_2.x86_64 today.

Comment 1 Nicolas Mitsis 2016-06-28 19:58:02 UTC
Created attachment 1173544 [details]
ssltap with tls 1.1

Comment 2 Nicolas Mitsis 2016-06-28 19:59:09 UTC
Created attachment 1173545 [details]
ssltap with tls 1.2

Comment 4 Martin Stransky 2016-06-29 11:50:32 UTC
Kai, any idea here? Thanks.

Comment 5 Kai Engert (:kaie) (inactive account) 2016-06-29 12:13:37 UTC
(In reply to Martin Stransky from comment #4)
> Kai, any idea here? Thanks.

This is apparently a duplicate of bug 1343202, both bugs talk about the same website.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1343202 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.