Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0. The upgrade date is tentatively scheduled for 2 December 2018, pending final testing and feedback.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.
Bug 135238 - CAN-2004-0409 XChat buffer overflow in socks5 proxy
CAN-2004-0409 XChat buffer overflow in socks5 proxy
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 2.1
Classification: Red Hat
Component: xchat (Show other bugs)
2.1
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Daniel Reed
: Security
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2004-10-11 04:19 EDT by Mark J. Cox
Modified: 2007-11-30 17:06 EST (History)
0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2004-10-27 11:14:18 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)


External Trackers
Tracker ID Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2004:585 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Low: xchat security update 2004-10-27 00:00:00 EDT

  None (edit)
Description Mark J. Cox 2004-10-11 04:19:31 EDT 
A flaw in the XChat's Socks-5 proxy code could allow arbitrary code
execution.  To exploit this flaw an attacker would need to create a
malicious socks-5 proxy that the victim connects to.

This issue was public on Mon, 5 Apr 2004 but is LOW severity.

This will be RHSA-2004:585 as part of RHEL2.1 Update 6.
Comment 1 Josh Bressers 2004-10-27 11:14:18 EDT 
An errata has been issued which should help the problem 
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being 
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files, 
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report 
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2004-585.html
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.