Bug 1352401 - [RHEL7] [Rebase] Samba: Yum update for Samba will fail due to higher versions in RHEL 7.3.0
Summary: [RHEL7] [Rebase] Samba: Yum update for Samba will fail due to higher versions...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Gluster Storage
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: samba
Version: rhgs-3.1
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
high
high
Target Milestone: ---
: RHGS 3.1.3 Async
Assignee: Jose A. Rivera
QA Contact: storage-qa-internal@redhat.com
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 1371988 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks: 1371992
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-07-04 06:04 UTC by Vivek Das
Modified: 2016-09-22 05:19 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version: samba-4.4.5-3
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-09-22 05:19:21 UTC
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2016:1913 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE gluster-smb bug fix update 2016-09-22 09:18:05 UTC

Description Vivek Das 2016-07-04 06:04:37 UTC 
Description of problem:


When it comes to samba installation RHEL 7.3 is shipping higher version 
of samba i.e 4.4.4.2 while RHGS has a lower version i.e 4.4.3.7.

(above scenario is verified without encountering any error)

Higher version of samba needs to be shipped before rhel7.3 release.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:
Comment 3 Jose A. Rivera 2016-08-31 16:11:07 UTC 
*** Bug 1371988 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 Vivek Das 2016-09-15 17:26:14 UTC 
Verified on samba-4.4.5-3
Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2016-09-22 05:19:21 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-1913.html
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.