Description of problem: oc sub-command should remain useful help info from kubectl sub-command. Because for some sub-commands, `oc sub-command -h` trims the more detailed/clearer description/examples from kubectl, which may be important to user. E.g. oc proxy -h VS kubectl proxy -h oc patch -h VS kubectl patch -h oc run -h VS kubectl run -h Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): oc v1.3.0-alpha.2-332-g8aaba51 kubernetes v1.3.0-alpha.3-599-g2746284 How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: Just takes some sub-commands as instance: 1. oc proxy -h VS kubectl proxy -h 2. oc patch -h VS kubectl patch -h 3. oc run -h VS kubectl run -h Actual results: 1. See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1344877#c3 . Reference to bug 1344877 just wants to say, trimmed info in `oc proxy -h` causes user misunderstanding 2. kubectl patch -h has more info than oc patch -h, such as more detailed examples about more flags 3. kubectl run -h has more useful examples, such as about '--command` specified or not Expected results: oc sub-commands should remain useful help info from kubectl sub-command Additional info: Remaining useful help info from kubectl sub-command could be used TOGETHER with adding help info to oc. E.g. it is good for 'oc logs -h' to add statements about bc/build than 'kubectl logs -h'
FYI, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1466671#c1 point 2 indicates user may have less confusion and know correct usage directly from oc help info, if oc help info is fuller.
Closing due to age.