RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1354406 - host-del updatedns options complains about missing ptr record for host
Summary: host-del updatedns options complains about missing ptr record for host
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Classification: Red Hat
Component: ipa
Version: 7.3
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: IPA Maintainers
QA Contact: Kaleem
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-07-11 09:13 UTC by Kaleem
Modified: 2016-11-04 05:57 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version: ipa-4.4.0-4.el7
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-11-04 05:57:14 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2016:2404 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE ipa bug fix and enhancement update 2016-11-03 13:56:18 UTC

Description Kaleem 2016-07-11 09:13:43 UTC 
Description of problem:

When --updatedns used along with host-del, it complains about missing ptr record for host which exists.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
[root@dhcp207-129 ~]# rpm -q ipa-server ipa-server-dns
ipa-server-4.4.0-1.el7.x86_64
ipa-server-dns-4.4.0-1.el7.noarch
[root@dhcp207-129 ~]#

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
[root@dhcp207-129 ~]# ipa host-add --ip-address=10.65.207.99 myhost.testrelm.test
---------------------------------
Added host "myhost.testrelm.test"
---------------------------------
  Host name: myhost.testrelm.test
  Principal name: host/myhost.testrelm.test
  Principal alias: host/myhost.testrelm.test
  Password: False
  Keytab: False
  Managed by: myhost.testrelm.test
[root@dhcp207-129 ~]# ipa host-show myhost.testrelm.test
  Host name: myhost.testrelm.test
  Principal name: host/myhost.testrelm.test
  Principal alias: host/myhost.testrelm.test
  Password: False
  Keytab: False
  Managed by: myhost.testrelm.test
[root@dhcp207-129 ~]# ipa dnsrecord-find testrelm.test myhost
  Record name: myhost
  A record: 10.65.207.99
----------------------------
Number of entries returned 1
----------------------------
[root@dhcp207-129 ~]# ipa dnsrecord-find 207.65.10.in-addr.arpa. 99
  Record name: 99
  PTR record: myhost.testrelm.test.
----------------------------
Number of entries returned 1
----------------------------
[root@dhcp207-129 ~]# ipa host-del --updatedns myhost.testrelm.test
ipa: ERROR: PTR record does not contain 'myhost.testrelm.test'
[root@dhcp207-129 ~]#

Actual results:
host not deleted

Expected results:
host should have been deleted along with dns records in forward/reverse zones.
Comment 3 Petr Vobornik 2016-07-12 15:50:44 UTC 
Upstream ticket:
https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/6060
Comment 4 Martin Bašti 2016-07-22 11:41:01 UTC 
Fixed upstream
master:
https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/changeset/8aba4f63439853d524e8b394b7919159c86d2a08
Comment 6 Kaleem 2016-08-03 13:02:02 UTC 
Verified.

[root@dhcp207-129 ~]# ipa host-add --ip-address=10.65.207.99 myhost.testrelm.test
---------------------------------
Added host "myhost.testrelm.test"
---------------------------------
  Host name: myhost.testrelm.test
  Principal name: host/myhost.testrelm.test
  Principal alias: host/myhost.testrelm.test
  Password: False
  Keytab: False
  Managed by: myhost.testrelm.test
[root@dhcp207-129 ~]# ipa dnsrecord-find testrelm.test myhost

  Record name: myhost
  A record: 10.65.207.99
----------------------------
Number of entries returned 1
----------------------------
[root@dhcp207-129 ~]# ipa dnsrecord-find 207.65.10.in-addr.arpa. 99
  Record name: 99
  PTR record: myhost.testrelm.test.
----------------------------
Number of entries returned 1
----------------------------
[root@dhcp207-129 ~]# ipa host-del --updatedns myhost.testrelm.test
-----------------------------------
Deleted host "myhost.testrelm.test"
-----------------------------------
[root@dhcp207-129 ~]# ipa dnsrecord-find testrelm.test myhost
----------------------------
Number of entries returned 0
----------------------------
[root@dhcp207-129 ~]# ipa dnsrecord-find 207.65.10.in-addr.arpa. 99
----------------------------
Number of entries returned 0
----------------------------
[root@dhcp207-129 ~]#
[root@dhcp207-129 ~]# rpm -q ipa-server
ipa-server-4.4.0-4.el7.x86_64
[root@dhcp207-129 ~]#
Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2016-11-04 05:57:14 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-2404.html
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.