Red Hat Bugzilla – Bug 1354655
rhel-s390x-server-rs-7-beta channel maps are absent from channel-cert-mapping.txt
Last modified: 2016-11-03 16:30:00 EDT
Description of problem: RHN Classic channel 'rhel-s390x-server-rs-7-beta' is accounted for in subscription-manager-migration-data file '/usr/share/rhsm/product/RHEL-7/channel-cert-mapping.txt'. expected:<true> but was:<false> RHN Classic channel 'rhel-s390x-server-rs-7-beta-debuginfo' is accounted for in subscription-manager-migration-data file '/usr/share/rhsm/product/RHEL-7/channel-cert-mapping.txt'. expected:<true> but was:<false> Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): [root@jsefler-rhel7 ~]# rpm -q subscription-manager-migration-data subscription-manager-migration-data-2.0.29-1.el7.noarch How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: [root@jsefler-rhel7 ~]# grep "rhel-s390x-server-rs-7-beta" /usr/share/rhsm/product/RHEL-7/channel-cert-mapping.txt [root@jsefler-rhel7 ~]# Actual results: above, no hits Expected results: expected to find product cert mappings for channels: rhel-s390x-server-rs-7-beta rhel-s390x-server-rs-7-beta-debuginfo Additional info: before subscription-manager-migration-data can be fixed, an update to upstream http://git.app.eng.bos.redhat.com/git/rcm/rcm-metadata.git/tree/cdn/product-certs.json is required
See the mappings for rhel-s390x-server-rs-7-beta rhel-s390x-server-rs-7-beta-debuginfo [root@dhcp35-77 ~]# rpm -qa | grep migration-data subscription-manager-migration-data-2.0.30-1.el7.noarch [root@dhcp35-77 ~]# grep "rhel-s390x-server-rs-7-beta" /usr/share/rhsm/product/RHEL-7/channel-cert-mapping.txt rhel-s390x-server-rs-7-beta: Server-ResilientStorage-s390x-9e0c24677164-299.pem rhel-s390x-server-rs-7-beta-debuginfo: Server-ResilientStorage-s390x-9e0c24677164-299.pem
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2592.html