Bug 1356454 - DHT: slow readdirp performance
Summary: DHT: slow readdirp performance
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Gluster Storage
Classification: Red Hat
Component: distribute
Version: rhgs-3.1
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
: RHGS 3.4.0
Assignee: Raghavendra G
QA Contact: Sachin P Mali
URL:
Whiteboard: dht-readdirp-perf, rebase
Depends On: 1356453 1424995 1457339 1457340 1457341
Blocks: 1264911 1283990 1503134
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-07-14 07:33 UTC by Sakshi
Modified: 2018-09-17 07:58 UTC (History)
8 users (show)

Fixed In Version: glusterfs-3.12.2-1
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of: 1356453
Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-09-04 06:29:40 UTC


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2018:2607 None None None 2018-09-04 06:31:22 UTC

Description Sakshi 2016-07-14 07:33:32 UTC
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1356453 +++

Description of problem:
Under utilization of buffer provided by kernel during a readdirp request. 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 3 Raghavendra G 2017-08-23 04:27:38 UTC
A patch [1] has been merged upstream. So, this bug can be proposed for rhgs-3.4.0

[1] https://review.gluster.org/12271

Comment 4 Raghavendra G 2017-09-04 10:31:54 UTC
The test case is basically checking whether getdents on 3.4.0 returns more number of dentries compared to the baseline version - say rhgs-3.3.0. We can also compare with getdents on local fs.

Comment 10 errata-xmlrpc 2018-09-04 06:29:40 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2607


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.