Bug 1357918 - Alarm ignores repeat_actions field
Summary: Alarm ignores repeat_actions field
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat OpenStack
Classification: Red Hat
Component: openstack-aodh
Version: 8.0 (Liberty)
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ga
: 8.0 (Liberty)
Assignee: Mehdi ABAAKOUK
QA Contact: Yurii Prokulevych
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 1357880
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-07-19 15:04 UTC by Mehdi ABAAKOUK
Modified: 2016-11-14 19:57 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version: openstack-aodh-1.1.3-1.el7ost
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of: 1357880
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-11-14 19:57:50 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
OpenStack gerrit 344263 0 None None None 2016-07-19 15:04:21 UTC
OpenStack gerrit 344275 0 None None None 2016-07-19 15:05:21 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2016:2712 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Red Hat OpenStack Platform 8 Bug Fix and Enhancement Advisory 2016-11-15 00:54:10 UTC

Description Mehdi ABAAKOUK 2016-07-19 15:04:22 UTC 
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1357880 +++

Description of problem:
-----------------------
Clone of upstream bug.

A composite alarm continues to send notifications/log info about alarm transition even repeat_actions is set to False.

Interesting that records in aodh/evaluator.log matches records from 'alarm history' output.

2016-05-11 10:15:08.143 93875 INFO aodh.notifier.rest [-] Notifying alarm Composite-Alarm 566bcde7-1757-4397-9585-c6efa3c7185b with severity critical from insufficient data to alarm with action SplitResult(scheme=u'http', netloc=u'127.0.0.1:15001', path=u'', query='', fragment='') because Composite rule alarm with composition form: (rule1 and rule2) transition to alarm, due to rules: rule1, rule2 outside their threshold.. request-id: req-e86b0f92-a267-4ed3-8289-724178d59547

2016-05-11 10:16:08.138 93875 INFO aodh.notifier.rest [-] Notifying alarm Composite-Alarm 566bcde7-1757-4397-9585-c6efa3c7185b with severity critical from alarm to alarm with action SplitResult(scheme=u'http', netloc=u'127.0.0.1:15001', path=u'', query='', fragment='') because Composite rule alarm with composition form: (rule1 and rule2) remaining as alarm, due to rules: rule1, rule2 outside their threshold.. request-id: req-57e6eb4a-3127-43f3-bcc2-4926539171e4


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
-------------------------------------------------------------
openstack-aodh-notifier-2.0.1-3.el7ost.noarch
python-aodh-2.0.1-3.el7ost.noarch
openstack-aodh-api-2.0.1-3.el7ost.noarch
openstack-aodh-evaluator-2.0.1-3.el7ost.noarch
python-aodh-tests-2.0.1-3.el7ost.noarch
openstack-aodh-listener-2.0.1-3.el7ost.noarch
openstack-aodh-common-2.0.1-3.el7ost.noarch
Comment 1 Mehdi ABAAKOUK 2016-08-05 13:46:51 UTC 
Waiting for next upstream liberty release to rebase the pkg
Comment 2 Mehdi ABAAKOUK 2016-09-12 07:09:36 UTC 
2.0.5 will be released upstream soon, with the fix https://review.openstack.org/#/c/368068/
Comment 3 Mehdi ABAAKOUK 2016-09-14 10:12:43 UTC 
I haven't updated the good BZ
Comment 4 Mehdi ABAAKOUK 2016-09-14 10:13:55 UTC 
For OSP8, we are waiting for 1.1.3 (and not 2.0.5).
Comment 6 Lon Hohberger 2016-11-07 21:58:32 UTC 
Patches noted are present in rebase to 1.1.3
Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2016-11-14 19:57:50 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-2712.html
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.