Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

This project is now read‑only. Starting Monday, February 2, please use https://ibm-ceph.atlassian.net/ for all bug tracking management.

Bug 1358024

Summary:	non-contiguous rgw_write/NFS WRITE operations no blocked
Product:	[Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage	Reporter:	Matt Benjamin (redhat) <mbenjamin>
Component:	RGW	Assignee:	Matt Benjamin (redhat) <mbenjamin>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Ramakrishnan Periyasamy <rperiyas>
Severity:	low	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	2.0	CC:	cbodley, ceph-eng-bugs, ceph-qe-bugs, hnallurv, kbader, kdreyer, mbenjamin, nlevine, owasserm, sweil, uboppana
Target Milestone:	rc
Target Release:	2.1
Hardware:	All
OS:	All
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	RHEL: ceph-10.2.2-24.el7cp Ubuntu: ceph_10.2.2-19redhat1xenial	Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2016-11-22 19:28:48 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	1357932
Bug Blocks:

Description Matt Benjamin (redhat) 2016-07-19 20:30:41 UTC

Description of problem:
The tech-preview RGW NFS is only expected to work with sync mounts (Linux -osync), but by inspection, this is not enforced

The server does not know or care about client mount options, but rgw_write should fail immediately if it sees partial or out-of-order write attempts on an open file.

Steps to Reproduce:
1. N/A

Comment 8 shylesh 2016-07-26 17:37:55 UTC

@Matt,

According to comment2 this bug is not for 2.0 but it has been put ON_QA. Do we have to verify this. If so could you please give me the steps to verify.

Thanks,
Shylesh

Comment 13 Ramakrishnan Periyasamy 2016-11-02 17:21:39 UTC

Hi Matt,

Please provide steps to verify this bug.

Regards,
Ramakrishnan

Comment 14 Matt Benjamin (redhat) 2016-11-02 17:34:40 UTC

(In reply to Ramakrishnan Periyasamy from comment #13)
> Hi Matt,
> 
> Please provide steps to verify this bug.
> 
> Regards,
> Ramakrishnan

Hi Ramakrishnan,

I think it is sufficient to verify only the ability to write objects of at least 1M in size, when the negotiated nfs wsize is 1M.

Comment 15 Ramakrishnan Periyasamy 2016-11-02 18:17:46 UTC

Tried writing objects of size 1M and more than 1M wsize.
moving this bug to verified state.

Comment 17 errata-xmlrpc 2016-11-22 19:28:48 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2815.html