Description of problem:
I'm not really sure what the proper ruling is there, but I thought we
were dropping references to "AMD64", chosing "X86_64" instead, as
that's the more general term which describes both "AMD64" and "EM64T"
At a minimum, should probably mimic the behavior that we currently
have on the live site, where packages/systems are described as
errata/RHSA-2004-467.html lists "x86_64"
network/errata/details/index.pxt?eid=2400 lists "AMD64/EM64T"
network/errata/details/package_list.pxt?eid=2400 lists "AMD64/EM64T"
network/software/packages/details.pxt?pid=266702 lists the package
with "x86_64.rpm", but Arch is shown as "AMD64" and Available
Archs shows "AMD64"
**** Related note! Isn't the plural of "arch" "arches"? ****
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Steps to Reproduce:
All of these complaints are still valid with the website today.