RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1358734 - Include RHGS NFS-Ganesha package related logs in sosreport
Summary: Include RHGS NFS-Ganesha package related logs in sosreport
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Classification: Red Hat
Component: sos
Version: 7.3
Hardware: All
OS: All
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Pavel Moravec
QA Contact: Anna Khaitovich
URL: https://github.com/sosreport/sos/pull...
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 1358732
Blocks: 1373361 1388569
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-07-21 11:51 UTC by Soumya Koduri
Modified: 2017-08-01 23:08 UTC (History)
16 users (show)

Fixed In Version: sos-3.4-1.el7
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of: 1358732
: 1373361 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-08-01 23:08:12 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2017:2203 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE sos bug fix and enhancement update 2017-08-01 19:41:56 UTC

Description Soumya Koduri 2016-07-21 11:51:52 UTC 
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1358732 +++

Description of problem:

The below log files are installed and used by RHGS nfs-ganesha* package. 

/var/log/ganesha.log
/var/log/ganesha-gfapi.log

These files need to be included in the sosreport.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:
Comment 2 Niels de Vos 2016-07-21 13:51:41 UTC 
/var/log/ganesha.log is part of the nfs-ganesha RPM, and only needs to be included when that is installed, or the "nfs-ganesha" service is available.

Note that /var/log/ganesha-gfapi.log only needs to be included in case nfs-ganesha-gluster is installed. This package provides a dynamically loadable 'plugin' called /usr/lib64/ganesha/libfsalgluster.so.

Most likely additional logs for the Ceph/RadosGW integration are needed too. Matt should be able to point those out.
Comment 3 Pavel Moravec 2016-12-15 12:31:48 UTC 
(In reply to Niels de Vos from comment #2)
> /var/log/ganesha.log is part of the nfs-ganesha RPM, and only needs to be
> included when that is installed, or the "nfs-ganesha" service is available.
> 
> Note that /var/log/ganesha-gfapi.log only needs to be included in case
> nfs-ganesha-gluster is installed. This package provides a dynamically
> loadable 'plugin' called /usr/lib64/ganesha/libfsalgluster.so.
> 
> Most likely additional logs for the Ceph/RadosGW integration are needed too.
> Matt should be able to point those out.

Matt, some additional requirements?
Comment 6 Pavel Moravec 2017-03-12 20:14:07 UTC 
POSTed to upstream as  	daaddf7
Comment 9 errata-xmlrpc 2017-08-01 23:08:12 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2017:2203
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.