Upstream PR: https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq/pull/10671
More necessary PRs https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq/pull/10784 https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq/pull/10788
https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq/pull/10784 has been backported to Darga: $ git log commit 242053d4867621d3f977d2f38ea8809892144be5 Author: Jason Frey <fryguy9> Date: Tue Aug 30 17:45:09 2016 -0400 Merge pull request #10784 from zeari/rollup_disconnected_entities Rollup disconnected container group metrics to container projects (cherry picked from commit 3a44b5a3e092a1ddbdc7613c682ebcaa61e73353)
https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq/pull/10788 has been backported to Darga: $ git log commit de3ced3c9c3acc8ac2fa6acb473b6b5728860206 Author: Gregg Tanzillo <gtanzill> Date: Thu Sep 1 18:22:23 2016 -0400 Merge pull request #10788 from zeari/base_containerProjectChargeback_on_ContainerProject_metrics base containerProjectChargeback on ContainerProject metrics (depends on #10784) (cherry picked from commit d178f083e8dd92ad9cf04918588a9dd0dac0d545)
https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq/pull/10671 has been backported to Darga: $ git log commit 5810554f3ee15574c4ded3f3717bf4cb3e0c56c6 Author: Gregg Tanzillo <gtanzill> Date: Thu Sep 1 18:22:43 2016 -0400 Merge pull request #10671 from zeari/chargeback_group_by_tags Chargeback group by tags (cherry picked from commit 21b63854f491d58c8e51dd9751331856fb95aa08)
Ari can you check if we can move this to POST (all the required PRs are backported). Thanks.
These reports fail for VM's. fix is here: https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq/pull/11010
The relevant 5.7 bug 1357214 is already to ON_QA, so there's definitely something wrong here. Why for this 5.6.2 BZ (deadline was last Friday) are we still ON_DEV even though the PRs mentioned in bug 1357214 are all backported? Why are we implying that this 5.6.2 BZ is waiting for a PR that is not even marked for darga? https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq/pull/11010
It was always unclear if all these features should also be implemented for VM's. While looking to see if we can move this to post i noticed that part wasnt in and thought to mention it. If it shoudlnt be implemented for vms we can definitely move this to post.
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1996.html