Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 1362204

Summary: Change DTS dockerfiles to match those used to build docker registry images
Product: Red Hat Developer Toolset Reporter: Marek Polacek <mpolacek>
Component: devtoolset-metaAssignee: Marek Polacek <mpolacek>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Miloš Prchlík <mprchlik>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: DTS 6.0 RHEL 7CC: fche, hhorak, jakub, mnewsome, mprchlik, ohudlick
Target Milestone: alpha   
Target Release: 6.0   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: devtoolset-6-6.0-4.el7 Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-11-15 10:02:26 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Marek Polacek 2016-08-01 14:18:42 UTC 
Currently, in the devtoolset metapackage we ship several dockerfiles.  These include:
* devtoolset-4
* devtoolset-4-dyninst
* devtoolset-4-elfutils
* devtoolset-4-oprofile
* devtoolset-4-systemtap
* devtoolset-4-toolchain
* devtoolset-4-valgrind
These dockerfiles reside in rhscl-dockerfiles repository, and are generated using scripts that are kept in another repository, rhscl2dockerfile.

We also ship built docker images.  These are:
* devtoolset-4-toolchain-docker
* devtoolset-4-perftools-docker
They're built from dockerfiles kept in a different repository: <http://pkgs.devel.redhat.com/cgit/rpms/devtoolset-4-toolchain-docker>.

So we keep two sets of dockerfiles.  The first set, kept in rhscl-dockerfiles, is outdated, and I wonder how well (if at all) they are tested.  In general, the rhscl-dockerfiles repository seems to be unmaintained these days.  On the flip side, the dockerfiles for docker images are up to date and we regularly build images from them.  I'm of the mind that we should in the near future work on consolidating these dockerfiles.  What I suggest is to:
- drop elfutils, dyninst, valgrind, oprofile, systemtap dockerfiles from the meta package,
- only ship toolchain/perftools dockerfiles coming from the maintained repo,
- for devtoolset-4-*-docker images change nothing.

Generally, the docker images contain dockerfiles, but not the other needed source files.  As Honza Horak pointed out to me, we don't have a similar concept to SRPMs in the RPM world.  We should probably work on that, too, though that seems more like a long-term problem.

I'd like to get the green light for my proposed approach.
Comment 8 Miloš Prchlík 2016-10-14 07:10:37 UTC 
Verified for build devtoolset-6-dockerfiles-6.0-6.el7 - only toolchain/perftools Dockerfiles are provided, no RHEL6 variant.
Comment 10 errata-xmlrpc 2016-11-15 10:02:26 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-2724.html