Bug 1362599 - [Beaker][WebUI][Legacy view] no way to Nak a recipe
Summary: [Beaker][WebUI][Legacy view] no way to Nak a recipe
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Beaker
Classification: Retired
Component: web UI
Version: 23
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
medium
medium
Target Milestone: 23.2
Assignee: Dan Callaghan
QA Contact: tools-bugs
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 1371206 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-08-02 15:26 UTC by Jeff Burke
Modified: 2016-09-02 07:01 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-09-02 07:01:29 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Jeff Burke 2016-08-02 15:26:16 UTC
Description of problem:
 Reverted to using legacy view. However we are missing the NAK feature in the legacy view. It is know as waived in the new view. Is there any way to have the legacy view use the new waived option?

Regards,
Jeff

Comment 1 Karel Srot 2016-08-10 09:22:58 UTC
I also miss this functionality as I am still not able to migrate to a new UI (due to particular informations missing in the new UI).

Comment 2 Dan Callaghan 2016-08-11 06:18:02 UTC
I had to take out the comment box from the old job page because it wasn't compatible with the new db structure for comments, and updating it would have been a lot of work. However I could have (should have, I guess) kept the ack/nack radio buttons.

Comment 3 Dan Callaghan 2016-08-12 04:42:20 UTC
As a workaround you can use the bkr job-modify command:

bkr job-modify RS:123 --response nak

Which reminds me, we should probably add a new option --waive to match the new terminology...

Comment 4 Dan Callaghan 2016-08-12 07:28:03 UTC
http://gerrit.beaker-project.org/5134

Comment 6 Roman Joost 2016-08-31 01:28:36 UTC
*** Bug 1371206 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 8 Dan Callaghan 2016-09-02 07:01:29 UTC
Beaker 23.2 has been released.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.