Bug 1365933 - The ls program can't be interrupted by a signal
Summary: The ls program can't be interrupted by a signal
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: coreutils
Version: 24
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Kamil Dudka
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1421802
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-08-10 14:30 UTC by David Howells
Modified: 2017-07-31 18:49 UTC (History)
9 users (show)

Fixed In Version: coreutils-8.25-15.fc26 coreutils-8.25-15.fc25 coreutils-8.25-7.fc24
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
: 1421802 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-11-05 09:40:12 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
[PATCH] ls: postpone installation of signal handlers (6.49 KB, patch)
2016-09-06 12:53 UTC, Kamil Dudka
no flags Details | Diff

Description David Howells 2016-08-10 14:30:01 UTC
Description of problem:

Whilst debugging some network filesystem stuff, I found that if the open directory system call fails with ERESTARTSYS due to a signal, that signal is deferred by userspace and the system call restarted.  Unfortunately, this means that an ls that is waiting for a network timeout cannot be cancelled with CTRL-C and cannot be suspended with CTRL-Z.

open("/afs/user/dhowells", O_RDONLY|O_NONBLOCK|O_DIRECTORY|O_CLOEXEC) = ? ERESTARTSYS (To be restarted if SA_RESTART is set)
--- SIGINT {si_signo=SIGINT, si_code=SI_KERNEL} ---
rt_sigreturn({mask=[]})                 = 2
open("/afs/user/dhowells", O_RDONLY|O_NONBLOCK|O_DIRECTORY|O_CLOEXEC) = ? ERESTARTSYS (To be restarted if SA_RESTART is set)
--- SIGQUIT {si_signo=SIGQUIT, si_code=SI_KERNEL} ---
rt_sigreturn({mask=[]})                 = 2
open("/afs/user/dhowells", O_RDONLY|O_NONBLOCK|O_DIRECTORY|O_CLOEXEC) = 3
fstat(3, {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0777, st_size=2048, ...}) = 0
getdents(3, /* 3 entries */, 32768)     = 80
rt_sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, [HUP INT QUIT PIPE ALRM TERM TSTP XCPU XFSZ VTALRM PROF IO], [], 8) = 0
rt_sigaction(SIGINT, {SIG_DFL, [INT], SA_RESTORER|SA_RESTART, 0x7f9c95c93b20}, {0x5640f276ce60, [HUP INT QUIT PIPE ALRM TERM TSTP XCPU XFSZ VTALRM PROF IO], SA_RESTORER|SA_RESTART, 0x7f9c95c93b20}, 8) = 0
tgkill(3954, 3954, SIGINT)              = 0
rt_sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, [], NULL, 8) = 0
--- SIGINT {si_signo=SIGINT, si_code=SI_TKILL, si_pid=3954, si_uid=0} ---
+++ killed by SIGINT +++

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

coreutils-8.24-6.fc23.x86_64

Unfortunately, it's quite hard to get hold of a directory that will hang for a long enough period of time, but if you can it's quite reproducible.

Comment 1 Kamil Dudka 2016-08-11 08:49:04 UTC
Could you please attach gdb while ls is hanging and paste the backtrace?

Comment 2 David Howells 2016-08-11 09:52:25 UTC
#0  0x00007faca7731455 in __opendir (name=0x560b8766cc90 "/afs/user/dhowells")
    at ../sysdeps/posix/opendir.c:200
#1  0x0000560b8744caed in print_dir (command_line_arg=<optimized out>, 
    realname=0x0, name=<optimized out>) at src/ls.c:2551
#2  main (argc=<optimized out>, argv=<optimized out>) at src/ls.c:1457

Comment 3 Kamil Dudka 2016-08-11 11:23:12 UTC
Does it work as expected with --color=none or if stdout is redirected off terminal?

Comment 4 David Howells 2016-08-11 11:51:47 UTC
ls --color=none can be interrupted, as can ls >/tmp/foo.  A subsequent ls without anything special will then still be uninterruptible until the network timeout occurs.

Comment 5 Kamil Dudka 2016-08-11 12:22:48 UTC
If ls prints to a terminal, it postpones processing of signals to always leave terminal in a consistent state when being terminated or suspended.  A possible solution would be to disable SA_RESTART before calling opendir() and process signals synchronously in an EINTR loop.  Nevertheless, I am afraid we will hit the same issue with subsequent stat() calls if the -l option is used.

Comment 6 Kamil Dudka 2016-08-15 14:05:35 UTC
reported upstream:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2016-08/msg00010.html

Comment 7 Kamil Dudka 2016-09-06 12:53:25 UTC
Created attachment 1198255 [details]
[PATCH] ls: postpone installation of signal handlers

... until they are actually needed.  That is right before the first
escape sequence is printed to a terminal.

Comment 8 Kamil Dudka 2016-09-06 12:54:39 UTC
Could you please test the attached patch?  Does it solve the problem for you?

I can prepare a scratch build for Fedora release of your choice if needed...

Comment 9 David Howells 2016-09-06 15:09:42 UTC
The patch works for me.  If I make afs_open() in the kernel sleep till a signal happens than then return -ERESTARTSYS, the old ls just restarts the open() system call when I press CTRL-C, but the patched ls is correctly killed by SIGINT.

Comment 10 Kamil Dudka 2016-09-06 15:42:04 UTC
Thank you for testing the patch!  I have proposed it to cureutils upstream:

http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=24232#17

Comment 12 Kamil Dudka 2016-09-07 18:30:01 UTC
Thanks for the upstream commit!  Included in coreutils-8.25-15.fc26...

Comment 13 Fedora Update System 2016-10-31 17:44:26 UTC
coreutils-8.25-15.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-be13b257bb

Comment 14 Fedora Update System 2016-10-31 17:46:17 UTC
coreutils-8.25-7.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-75adc7da4f

Comment 15 Fedora Update System 2016-11-01 02:22:13 UTC
coreutils-8.25-15.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-be13b257bb

Comment 16 Fedora Update System 2016-11-01 18:22:54 UTC
coreutils-8.25-7.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-75adc7da4f

Comment 17 Fedora Update System 2016-11-03 18:29:36 UTC
coreutils-8.25-15.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 18 Fedora Update System 2016-11-03 23:55:08 UTC
coreutils-8.25-7.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 19 Fedora Update System 2016-11-19 21:06:42 UTC
coreutils-8.25-15.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.