Description of problem: Dsicrepancy between the cluster list window and the actual value shown in the performance portion of the cluster view Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 2.0 (0.0.39) How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: 1. Look at the cluster list and observe the value of operations per second 2. Look at the cluster view and observe the value of operations per second 3. Unit used differs although the metric value stores seems to be corresponding Actual results: In my case list show 1.2 B IOPS while cluster view shows 1.2K IOPS Expected results: Same value and same unit Additional info: If value is below 1, list displays 0.6 IOPS while cluster view shows 0.6 K IOPS
I acknowledge that this is an issue. probably we might not want to block the release for this. Can be addressed later
Created attachment 1205884 [details] Wrong IOPS unit
There is an incorrect unit (B - as seen on a screenshot) on list of clusters. On cluster overview and dashboard it seams to be OK (there are no units). --> Assigned
Tested with Server: ceph-ansible-1.0.5-34.el7scon.noarch ceph-installer-1.0.15-2.el7scon.noarch graphite-web-0.9.15-1.el7.noarch rhscon-ceph-0.0.43-1.el7scon.x86_64 rhscon-core-0.0.45-1.el7scon.x86_64 rhscon-core-selinux-0.0.45-1.el7scon.noarch rhscon-ui-0.0.59-1.el7scon.noarch Node: calamari-server-1.4.8-1.el7cp.x86_64 ceph-base-10.2.2-41.el7cp.x86_64 ceph-common-10.2.2-41.el7cp.x86_64 ceph-mon-10.2.2-41.el7cp.x86_64 ceph-osd-10.2.2-41.el7cp.x86_64 ceph-selinux-10.2.2-41.el7cp.x86_64 libcephfs1-10.2.2-41.el7cp.x86_64 python-cephfs-10.2.2-41.el7cp.x86_64 rhscon-agent-0.0.19-1.el7scon.noarch rhscon-core-selinux-0.0.45-1.el7scon.noarch and it works as it is expected. --> Verified
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:2082