Bug 1366967 - Tor broken after openssl update
Summary: Tor broken after openssl update
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 1357395
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: tor
Version: 24
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-08-15 07:26 UTC by Paul DeStefano
Modified: 2020-11-05 09:32 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-10-02 18:08:48 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Paul DeStefano 2016-08-15 07:26:25 UTC
Description of problem:
Tor is broken after weekly system update.  Complains about wrong openssl version.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
openssl-1.0.2h-3.fc24.x86_64
openssl-libs-1.0.2h-3.fc24.x86_64
openssl-libs-1.0.2h-3.fc24.i686
tor-0.2.7.6-6.fc24.x86_64


How reproducible:
Well, so far, I cannot start tor since the upgrade.

Steps to Reproduce:
1. dnf upgrade
2. start tor

Actual results:
Aug 14 22:26:11 <hostname> systemd[1]: Starting Anonymizing overlay network for TCP...
Aug 14 22:26:12 <hostname> tor[1656]: Aug 14 22:26:12.270 [notice] Tor v0.2.7.6 running on Linux with Libevent 2.0.21-stable, OpenSSL 1.0.2h-fips and Zlib 1.2.8.
Aug 14 22:26:12 <hostname> tor[1656]: Aug 14 22:26:12.270 [notice] Tor can't help you if you use it wrong! Learn how to be safe at https://www.torproject.org/download/download#warni
Aug 14 22:26:12 <hostname> tor[1656]: Aug 14 22:26:12.292 [notice] Read configuration file "/usr/share/tor/defaults-torrc".
Aug 14 22:26:12 <hostname> tor[1656]: Aug 14 22:26:12.298 [notice] Read configuration file "/etc/tor/torrc".
Aug 14 22:26:12 <hostname> tor[1656]: Configuration was valid
Aug 14 22:26:12 <hostname> tor[1687]: Aug 14 22:26:12.494 [notice] Tor v0.2.7.6 running on Linux with Libevent 2.0.21-stable, OpenSSL 1.0.2h-fips and Zlib 1.2.8.
Aug 14 22:26:12 <hostname> tor[1687]: Aug 14 22:26:12.495 [notice] Tor can't help you if you use it wrong! Learn how to be safe at https://www.torproject.org/download/download#warni
Aug 14 22:26:12 <hostname> tor[1687]: Aug 14 22:26:12.495 [notice] Read configuration file "/usr/share/tor/defaults-torrc".
Aug 14 22:26:12 <hostname> tor[1687]: Aug 14 22:26:12.495 [notice] Read configuration file "/etc/tor/torrc".
Aug 14 22:26:12 <hostname> tor[1687]: Aug 14 22:26:12.498 [notice] Opening OR listener on 192.168.20.110:9001
Aug 14 22:26:12 <hostname> Tor[1687]: OpenSSL version from headers does not match the version we're running with. If you get weird crashes, that might be why. (Compiled with 1000206
Aug 14 22:26:12 <hostname> Tor[1687]: Tor v0.2.7.6 running on Linux with Libevent 2.0.21-stable, OpenSSL 1.0.2h-fips and Zlib 1.2.8.
Aug 14 22:26:12 <hostname> Tor[1687]: Tor can't help you if you use it wrong! Learn how to be safe at https://www.torproject.org/download/download#warning

Comment 1 Paul DeStefano 2016-08-19 08:16:17 UTC
Perhaps I should have increased the severity of this bug.  I'm curious what maintainers are thinking.  Should I wait for a fix in tor?  Wait for a fix in openssl?  Any estimate on the time frame?

I was going to just wait for a fix, but now I have a new reason I want to restore this service, so I'm just asking.

Comment 2 Jamie Nguyen 2016-08-22 06:03:25 UTC
I think this is the problem, not the version of OpenSSL:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357395

Comment 3 Paul DeStefano 2016-08-22 07:47:09 UTC
Thank you!  I desperately needed that information.

This is very upsetting.

1) I have not been notified of any SELinux alerts.
2) Tor was working one week ago, before system update, a full month after bug 1357395 was reported.

Nevertheless, I now see AVCs in the journal if I search for them, manually.  Something is terribly wrong that I didn't get sealerts for these and they still don't show up in SEAlert GUI, but I guess that's a separate issue.

Comment 4 Michael S. 2016-10-02 18:08:48 UTC
So, I am closing this bug as duplicate, please reopen if it was not the case.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1357395 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.