+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #988667 +++ Spec URL: https://gergelypolonkai.fedorapeople.org/valadoc/valadoc.spec SRPM URL: https://gergelypolonkai.fedorapeople.org/valadoc/valadoc-0.30-1.fc23.src.rpm Description: Valadoc is a documentation generator for generating API documentation from Vala source code based on libvala. Fedora Account System Username: gergelypolonkai
*** Bug 988667 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Created attachment 1191731 [details] log from failed build in fedora-rawhide-x86_64 mock I tried to build the updated package, but it fails because /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/valadoc-0.30-1.fc26.x86_64/usr/lib64/valadoc/drivers/ does not exist. First it fails in %install in find (because the directory does not exists). If I comment that out, it fails in %files: RPM build errors: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/valadoc-0.30-1.fc26.x86_64/usr/lib64/valadoc/drivers/0.30.x/libdriver.so Full build log attached.
It's a bit strange, as the files are the same as in the old ticket… I will take a look into it and get back with the results. Also, should I build on Fedora 24 now it is out? The old SRPM was built on F23.
The SRPM doesn't need to be rebuilt: the result is (except in some special cases) the same, no matter what the build host. The binary RPMs should be built on rawhide (in mock, see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_an_RPM_package#Mock_and_Koji).
That's exactly the strange part, I had successful mock and koji builds. Still, I'm already looking into it, I hope I can provide a working package soon.
It seems to be a vala version problem. On F23: checking for valac... /usr/bin/valac checking whether /usr/bin/valac is at least version 0.15.1... yes checking for LIBGVC... yes checking for GLIB... yes checking for GMODULE... yes checking for LIBGEE... yes checking for CGRAPH... yes checking for LIBVALA_0_30_X... yes checking for LIBVALA_0_28_X... no checking for LIBVALA_0_26_X... no checking for LIBVALA_0_24_X... no checking for LIBVALA_0_22_X... no checking for LIBVALA_0_20_X... no checking for LIBVALA_0_18_X... no checking for LIBVALA_0_16_X... no On F24+: checking whether /usr/bin/valac is at least version 0.15.1... yes checking for LIBGVC... yes checking for GLIB... yes checking for GMODULE... yes checking for LIBGEE... yes checking for CGRAPH... yes checking for LIBVALA_0_30_X... no checking for LIBVALA_0_28_X... no checking for LIBVALA_0_26_X... no checking for LIBVALA_0_24_X... no checking for LIBVALA_0_22_X... no checking for LIBVALA_0_20_X... no checking for LIBVALA_0_18_X... no checking for LIBVALA_0_16_X... no And indeed, F24 has vala-0.32.1-1.fc24.x86_64.
Yes, upstream has been already upgraded to 0.32, and as F24 already has Vala 0.32, maybe I should also upgrade this package (as valadoc follows vala's version numbers, obviously)
Yep, looks like an upgrade is needed. Probably some recent git snapshot would be good.
Supprised to find valadoc is not in the Fedora repo yet. Any progress on this?
It seems valadoc is already present in F32.