Bug 1367441 - [RHCS-1.3] ceph-objectstore-tool: ability to perform filestore splits offline : new command apply-layout-settings
Summary: [RHCS-1.3] ceph-objectstore-tool: ability to perform filestore splits offline...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Ceph Storage
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: RADOS
Version: 1.3.2
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
high
high
Target Milestone: rc
: 1.3.4
Assignee: Josh Durgin
QA Contact: ceph-qe-bugs
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1394936
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-08-16 12:07 UTC by Vikhyat Umrao
Modified: 2019-12-16 06:22 UTC (History)
11 users (show)

Fixed In Version: RHEL: ceph-0.94.9-4.el7cp Ubuntu: ceph_0.94.9-5redhat1
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
.Collection splitting can be now done offline This update adds the `apply-layout-settings` command to the `ceph-objectstore-tool` utility. The new command enables users to perform collection splitting offline on OSD nodes in cases when doing it online would cause too large an impact.
Clone Of:
: 1367442 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-12-01 21:38:45 UTC
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Ceph Project Bug Tracker 17220 0 None None None 2016-09-22 16:13:15 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2016:2847 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Moderate: Red Hat Ceph Storage 1.3 security, bug fix, and enhancement update 2016-12-02 02:38:33 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2016:2848 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Moderate: Red Hat Ceph Storage 1.3 security, bug fix, and enhancement update 2016-12-02 03:04:31 UTC

Description Vikhyat Umrao 2016-08-16 12:07:21 UTC 
Description of problem:

ceph-objectstore-tool with new option 'apply-layout-settings'


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Red Hat Ceph Storage 1.3.2
Comment 1 Ken Dreyer (Red Hat) 2016-08-17 14:38:24 UTC 
Not yet implemented upstream, re-targeting to 1.3.4
Comment 5 Ken Dreyer (Red Hat) 2016-09-22 16:13:16 UTC 
From discussion in the clone bz 1367442, the appropriate upstream tracker here is actually http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17220 .

Still need to know if we should leave this BZ open for RHCS 1.3 or not.
Comment 6 Vikhyat Umrao 2016-09-22 19:17:49 UTC 
(In reply to Ken Dreyer (Red Hat) from comment #5)
> From discussion in the clone bz 1367442, the appropriate upstream tracker
> here is actually http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17220 .
> 
> Still need to know if we should leave this BZ open for RHCS 1.3 or not.

Yes I think we should. As we have seen customer issues in 1.3. 
and in upstream it is getting backported to hammer with ticket: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17383
Comment 7 Josh Durgin 2016-09-30 22:23:53 UTC 
This can be tested by running a subset of the rados:thrash suite, since https://github.com/ceph/ceph-qa-suite/pull/1192 exercises it.
Comment 11 Vasu Kulkarni 2016-11-29 17:55:22 UTC 
Verified in 0.94.9-7.el7cp

http://pulpito.ceph.redhat.com/vasu-2016-11-28_14:28:28-rados:thrash-hammer---basic-multi/
Comment 13 errata-xmlrpc 2016-12-01 21:38:45 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2847.html
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.