RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1367528 - RFE: Allow filtering in the FORWARD chain
Summary: RFE: Allow filtering in the FORWARD chain
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
Classification: Red Hat
Component: firewalld
Version: 8.0
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: 8.1
Assignee: Eric Garver
QA Contact: qe-baseos-daemons
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 1682341 1872702
Blocks: 1160348
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-08-16 16:21 UTC by lejeczek
Modified: 2021-02-04 14:51 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-11-01 03:03:02 UTC
Type: Bug
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Github t-woerner firewalld issues 2 0 None None None 2020-10-06 12:26:03 UTC
Red Hat Bugzilla 1492722 1 None None None 2023-09-07 19:01:48 UTC

Internal Links: 1492722

Description lejeczek 2016-08-16 16:21:16 UTC
Description of problem:

... traffic between those interfaces?
I've tried declaring "sources" but it did not affect anything in the way I'd expected.
Is this not a bug?

I expected this a natural way to forward traffic between interfaces/subnets, to put them in the same zone. I've been reading and I apologize if I still miss this - how to pass/route LAN to LAN with firewalld - this should be one liner, one option, no?

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

firewalld-0.3.9-14.el7.noarch

How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 2 Thomas Woerner 2016-09-02 13:15:35 UTC
I am sorry, bit this is not natively supported by firewalld at the moment.

There is a feature request upstream to add this upstream: https://github.com/t-woerner/firewalld/issues/2

It is planned for firewalld version 0.5.

Comment 5 Eric Garver 2018-06-06 15:47:03 UTC
bump to 7.7.0

Comment 6 Eric Garver 2018-11-16 18:48:17 UTC
This is would be a large change to firewalld both in the user interfaces and dbus API. As such I don't think it's appropriate for RHEL-7 at this point in its life cycle.

I'm bumping this to RHEL-8. It's also heavily related to bug 1492722 (OUTPUT filtering).

Comment 14 RHEL Program Management 2020-11-01 03:03:02 UTC
After evaluating this issue, there are no plans to address it further or fix it in an upcoming release.  Therefore, it is being closed.  If plans change such that this issue will be fixed in an upcoming release, then the bug can be reopened.

Comment 15 lejeczek 2020-11-06 19:50:50 UTC
Can I ask for bit more clarification - if this is not going to be implemented - is/will there be a way/technique to forward traffic between interfaces in some orderly manner?
At the moment it seems that traffic only gets passed if ifaces are in "trusted" zone, which defeats the purpose, in my opinion at least.

Comment 16 Eric Garver 2020-11-07 13:59:28 UTC
(In reply to lejeczek from comment #15)
> Can I ask for bit more clarification

The feature is in upstream firewalld [1]. The feature is large enough that it will only make it's way into RHEL-8 via a package rebase. A backport is not viable. If a rebase does occur in RHEL-8, then we will reopen this bug.

[1]: https://firewalld.org/2020/09/policy-objects-introduction


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.