Spec URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/znc-clientbuffer.spec SRPM URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/znc-clientbuffer-0-0.1gitfe0f368.fc26.src.rpm Description: The client buffer module maintains client specific buffers for identified clients. Fedora Account System Username: ignatenkobrain
I've been using this for a few days now and it's working great, so let's get it into the distribution proper. There isn't much to this package. It's just one source file. Upstream has never made a release, so Version: 0 is appropriate. Most of the fedora-review template is kind of pointless but it doesn't hurt to paste it. But first... Note that nothing owns %_libdir/znc, which fedora-review conveniently complains of. This is a bug in znc, which I'll file. I know there isn't much in README.md, but it should be packaged since at least it includes a link to proper documentation and information about the author. I'm supposed to ask you to ask upstream to include a proper license file in their source. So, really, it's just one %doc line, I think. Not worth holding this up over that. APPROVED Fedora review output: C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: There is no build directory. Running licensecheck on vanilla upstream sources. Licenses found: "Apache (v2.0)", "Unknown or generated". 1 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/tibbs/work/review/1367819-znc- clientbuffer/licensecheck.txt [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. Note: No known owner of /usr/lib64/znc [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib64/znc [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s). Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: znc-clientbuffer-0-0.1gitfe0f368.fc24.x86_64.rpm znc-clientbuffer-debuginfo-0-0.1gitfe0f368.fc24.x86_64.rpm znc-clientbuffer-0-0.1gitfe0f368.fc24.src.rpm znc-clientbuffer.x86_64: W: no-documentation 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Rpmlint (debuginfo) ------------------- Checking: znc-clientbuffer-debuginfo-0-0.1gitfe0f368.fc24.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- znc-clientbuffer.x86_64: W: no-documentation 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Requires -------- znc-clientbuffer (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): libc.so.6()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.9)(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH) znc(x86-64) znc-clientbuffer-debuginfo (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): Provides -------- znc-clientbuffer: znc-clientbuffer znc-clientbuffer(x86-64) znc-clientbuffer-debuginfo: znc-clientbuffer-debuginfo znc-clientbuffer-debuginfo(x86-64) Unversioned so-files -------------------- znc-clientbuffer: /usr/lib64/znc/clientbuffer.so Source checksums ---------------- https://github.com/jpnurmi/znc-clientbuffer/archive/fe0f368e1fcab2b89d5c94209822d9b616cea840/znc-clientbuffer-fe0f368.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 64130fa79317f92e919692684eeb32600eeb440d8fdde941f3aee11b80917323 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 64130fa79317f92e919692684eeb32600eeb440d8fdde941f3aee11b80917323 Generated by fedora-review 0.6.1 (f03e4e7) last change: 2016-05-02 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -v -b 1367819 Buildroot used: fedora-24-x86_64 Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api, C/C++ Disabled plugins: Java, Python, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R, PHP Disabled flags: EXARCH, DISTTAG, EPEL5, BATCH, EPEL6
Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/znc-clientbuffer
znc-clientbuffer-0-0.1gitfe0f368.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-c61fb204df
znc-clientbuffer-0-0.1gitfe0f368.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-bb95d1dd68
znc-clientbuffer-0-0.1gitfe0f368.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-bb95d1dd68
znc-clientbuffer-0-0.1gitfe0f368.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-c61fb204df
znc-clientbuffer-0-0.1gitfe0f368.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
znc-clientbuffer-0-0.1gitfe0f368.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.