Bug 1369443
| Summary: | RFE: sssctl does not show exact file name having the error | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | Reporter: | Madhuri <mupadhye> |
| Component: | sssd | Assignee: | SSSD Maintainers <sssd-maint> |
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Steeve Goveas <sgoveas> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 8.0 | CC: | grajaiya, jhrozek, lslebodn, mkosek, mzidek, pbrezina, thalman, tscherf |
| Target Milestone: | pre-dev-freeze | Keywords: | FutureFeature, Reopened |
| Target Release: | 8.1 | Flags: | pm-rhel:
mirror+
|
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2020-04-24 09:42:12 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | 1394205 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | |||
|
Description
Madhuri
2016-08-23 12:44:43 UTC
It's not a bug it's expected behaviour. Because the validation is done after merging all snippets file together So the information about files and lines are lost. BTW. It's not too difficult for users to call grep and find typos. (In reply to Lukas Slebodnik from comment #1) > It's not a bug it's expected behaviour. > > Because the validation is done after merging all snippets file together > So the information about files and lines are lost. > BTW. It's not too difficult for users to call grep and find typos. OK, I wasn't sure if this was totally not possible or just not implemented. Therefore I asked for this bug to be filed so we can ask Michal next week and let him close the bug or leave it open for future. We can consider this ticket as RFE :-) Michal is this possible at all (so should we turn this bug into an RFE) or should we rather close it? We plan to add feature into sssctl that will print values of all configured options (only options that were explicitly configured, not default ones) together with their source file (snippet file or sssd.conf). This is however not possible with the current version of libini. We will have to enhance it to store additional metadata during the parsing. When this is done, this RFE will be simple. However we did not plan (in terms of milestones) the above feature yet. (In reply to Michal Zidek from comment #6) > We plan to add feature into sssctl that will print values of all configured > options (only options that were explicitly configured, not default ones) > together with their source file (snippet file or sssd.conf). > > This is however not possible with the current version of libini. We will > have to enhance it to store additional metadata during the parsing. When > this is done, this RFE will be simple. > > However we did not plan (in terms of milestones) the above feature yet. OK, can you file ticket(s) please? Upstream ticket: https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/3158 Upstream ticket: https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/3158 Since fixing this bug requires work in the upstream SSSD project which is not scheduled for the immediate future, I added a conditional development nack, pending upstream availability. Due to out limited capacity we are closing this BZ. |