Bug 1369986 - Should use reclaim policy retain instead of recycle in glusterfs doc examples
Summary: Should use reclaim policy retain instead of recycle in glusterfs doc examples
Keywords:
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: OKD
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Documentation
Version: 3.x
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: Nobody
QA Contact: Ronaldo Rivera
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-08-25 01:57 UTC by Liang Xia
Modified: 2022-01-14 13:12 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Target Upstream Version:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description Liang Xia 2016-08-25 01:57:00 UTC 
Description of problem:
In doc https://docs.openshift.org/latest/install_config/persistent_storage/selector_label_binding.html#selector-label-volume-define
we use reclaim policy recycle, but recycle is not supported for glusterfs,
should be changed to retain. 

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Check https://docs.openshift.org/latest/install_config/persistent_storage/selector_label_binding.html#selector-label-volume-define

Actual results:
Reclaim policy recycle used for glusterfs.

Expected results:
Should use retain reclaim policy since recycle is not supported for glusterfs.

Additional info:
Comment 1 Liang Xia 2016-08-25 02:00:40 UTC 
And here https://docs.openshift.org/latest/install_config/storage_examples/binding_pv_by_label.html#binding-pv-by-label-pv-with-labels
Comment 2 Liang Xia 2016-08-25 02:20:25 UTC 
https://docs.openshift.org/latest/install_config/persistent_storage/persistent_storage_glusterfs.html#gfs-creating-persistent-volume
Comment 3 Liang Xia 2016-08-25 05:46:47 UTC 
PR https://github.com/openshift/openshift-docs/pull/2735
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.