Description of problem: Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info:
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/15316 (tests: change EXPECT_WITHIN timeouts) posted (#2) for review on master by Anuradha Talur (atalur)
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/15316 (tests: change EXPECT_WITHIN timeouts) posted (#3) for review on master by Anuradha Talur (atalur)
COMMIT: http://review.gluster.org/15316 committed in master by Pranith Kumar Karampuri (pkarampu) ------ commit 70dabd796c04eb6e95fbf83e73219e671cc05dd3 Author: Anuradha Talur <atalur> Date: Thu Aug 25 12:19:16 2016 +0530 tests: change EXPECT_WITHIN timeouts Use defined HEAL and PROCESS_UP timeouts rather than hard code them in self-heald.t. Change-Id: I21586811904c8417b7208bb643f14dff20dc4832 BUG: 1370074 Signed-off-by: Anuradha Talur <atalur> Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/15316 Reviewed-by: Ravishankar N <ravishankar> Tested-by: Ravishankar N <ravishankar> Smoke: Gluster Build System <jenkins.org> NetBSD-regression: NetBSD Build System <jenkins.org> Reviewed-by: Krutika Dhananjay <kdhananj> CentOS-regression: Gluster Build System <jenkins.org> Reviewed-by: Pranith Kumar Karampuri <pkarampu>
This bug is getting closed because a release has been made available that should address the reported issue. In case the problem is still not fixed with glusterfs-3.9.0, please open a new bug report. glusterfs-3.9.0 has been announced on the Gluster mailinglists [1], packages for several distributions should become available in the near future. Keep an eye on the Gluster Users mailinglist [2] and the update infrastructure for your distribution. [1] http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/2016-November/029281.html [2] https://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/