Bug 1370103 - [RFE] use virtlogd as introduced in libvirt >= 1.3.0
Summary: [RFE] use virtlogd as introduced in libvirt >= 1.3.0
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DEFERRED
Alias: None
Product: vdsm
Classification: oVirt
Component: Core
Version: 4.18.11
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
low
low vote
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: Francesco Romani
QA Contact: meital avital
URL:
Whiteboard: virt
Depends On: 1321010
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-08-25 10:31 UTC by Francesco Romani
Modified: 2017-12-22 07:46 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of: 1321010
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-09-12 11:12:36 UTC
oVirt Team: Virt
fromani: ovirt-4.0.z?
rule-engine: planning_ack?
rule-engine: devel_ack?
rule-engine: testing_ack?


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
oVirt gerrit 61481 0 None None None 2016-08-25 10:31:02 UTC
oVirt gerrit 62838 0 ovirt-4.0 ABANDONED Revert "configurator: libvirt: do not jump on virtlogd" 2016-09-20 08:12:27 UTC

Comment 1 Michal Skrivanek 2016-08-25 14:50:42 UTC
do we know how it works on NGN?
do we know the settings of virtlogd - retention of logs, etc?
does sosreport grab those logs?

Comment 2 Francesco Romani 2016-08-29 11:34:22 UTC
(In reply to Michal Skrivanek from comment #1)
> do we know how it works on NGN?
> do we know the settings of virtlogd - retention of logs, etc?
> does sosreport grab those logs?

Good points: We don't know.

Furthermore, RHEL 7.2 has already virtlogd, so we don't need this patch for 7.3 more than we did for 7.2, decreasing the priority even more.

The change itself is trivial, but we need more time to fix/check the surrounding environment. Let's close this for now, we'll tackle this later -if needed.

Comment 3 Francesco Romani 2016-09-12 11:12:36 UTC
reopened by mistake, re-closing.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.