Ticket created to track: https://trello.com/c/LMc4eVgW/105-5-storage-classes-match-labels-with-the-selectors-ops-rfe-qos Mirrored: As a user I want the storage-class labels to match on the pv-selector so I can explicitly ask for a storage with certain properties (speed, ...), assuming that the system admin labeled the Persistent Volumes appropriately.
I do not understand this BZ. The card in question is done, complete, and closed. The phrase 'storage-class labels' does not make sense to me. Well, the StorageClass object does have labels, but they are not relevant to any form of PVC->PV binding. For a PVC to bind to a PV the size, access mode, StorageClass, and LabelSelector between the PVC and PV must ALL be satisfied. Is this BZ just intended to be a placeholder until the LabelSelector is in OCP (3.3?) or when StorageClasses are in OCP (3.4?)
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2017:0066
The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 1000 days