Bug 1372918 - Review Request: rubygem-rspectacular -RSpec Support And Matchers
Summary: Review Request: rubygem-rspectacular -RSpec Support And Matchers
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: FE-DEADREVIEW 1372926
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-09-03 20:30 UTC by Ilia Gradina
Modified: 2021-08-29 00:45 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2021-08-29 00:45:50 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Ilia Gradina 2016-09-03 20:30:55 UTC
Spec URL: https://github.com/ilgrad/fedora-packages/raw/master/rubygems/rubygem-rspectacular.spec
SRPM URL: https://github.com/ilgrad/fedora-packages/raw/master/rubygems/rubygem-rspectacular-0.70.7-1.fc25.src.rpm
Description: RSpec Support And Matchers
Fedora Account System Username: ilgrad

Comment 1 Ilia Gradina 2017-07-11 22:22:23 UTC
ping?
There is no repository(.
No file LICENCE.
- https://github.com/jfelchner/ruby-progressbar/issues/123

Comment 2 Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 2017-09-12 16:29:58 UTC
Hello,


 - I suggest you change the URL to: https://rubygems.org/gems/rspectacular

 - Group: is not used in Fedora. See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Tags_and_Sections

 - Since the repo with the LICENSE doesn't exist anymore, I guess we can join the LICENSE directly as SOurce1.

 - I'm missing a dependency: DEBUG util.py:450:  No matching package to install: 'rubygem(fuubar)'

  Apparrently it's not packaged for Fedora yet, would you package it?

Comment 3 Package Review 2021-04-25 00:45:25 UTC
This is an automatic check from review-stats script.

This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time, but it seems
that the review is still being working out by you. If this is right, please
respond to this comment clearing the NEEDINFO flag and try to reach out the
submitter to proceed with the review.

If you're not interested in reviewing this ticket anymore, please clear the
fedora-review flag and reset the assignee, so that a new reviewer can take
this ticket.

Without any reply, this request will shortly be resetted.

Comment 4 jakub.jedelsky 2021-05-10 21:04:30 UTC
i don't remember what is this about, maybe a typo in assignee? Sorry for mess, leaving for another brave reviewer.

Comment 5 Package Review 2021-08-29 00:45:50 UTC
This is an automatic action taken by review-stats script.

The ticket submitter failed to clear the NEEDINFO flag in a month.
As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews
we consider this ticket as DEADREVIEW and proceed to close it.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.