Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0. The upgrade date is tentatively scheduled for 2 December 2018, pending final testing and feedback.
Bug 1373183 - Add FIPS XTS key verification (encryption and tweak key must be different)
Add FIPS XTS key verification (encryption and tweak key must be different)
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Classification: Red Hat
Component: openssl (Show other bugs)
7.3
Unspecified Unspecified
high Severity high
: rc
: ---
Assigned To: Tomas Mraz
Stefan Dordevic
Mark Flitter
:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1377248 1367490
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2016-09-05 08:40 EDT by Tomas Mraz
Modified: 2017-08-01 14:16 EDT (History)
6 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version: openssl-1.0.2k-1.el7
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Ensure that AES-XTS support is compliant The current guidance for FIPS 140-2 validation has added the requirement to check whether both parts of the XTS key are different. This has been implemented.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
: 1432994 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-08-01 14:16:10 EDT
Type: Bug
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)


External Trackers
Tracker ID Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2017:1929 normal SHIPPED_LIVE openssl bug fix and enhancement update 2017-08-01 14:08:01 EDT

  None (edit)
Description Tomas Mraz 2016-09-05 08:40:48 EDT
Current implementation guidance for FIPS 140-2 validation adds requirement to check whether both parts of the XTS key are different.

We must implement this to make AES-XTS support compliant.
Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2017-08-01 14:16:10 EDT
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2017:1929

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.