Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0. The upgrade date is tentatively scheduled for 2 December 2018, pending final testing and feedback.
Bug 1373297 - openssh can't be installed without selinux-policy
openssh can't be installed without selinux-policy
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Classification: Red Hat
Component: openssh (Show other bugs)
7.3
All Linux
unspecified Severity high
: rc
: 7.3
Assigned To: Jakub Jelen
Stanislav Zidek
: Regression
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2016-09-05 17:34 EDT by Petr Lautrbach
Modified: 2016-11-03 16:20 EDT (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version: openssh-6.6.1p1-31.el7
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-11-03 16:20:42 EDT
Type: Bug
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)


External Trackers
Tracker ID Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2016:2588 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Moderate: openssh security, bug fix, and enhancement update 2016-11-03 08:09:45 EDT

  None (edit)
Description Petr Lautrbach 2016-09-05 17:34:18 EDT
Description of problem:

Since 6.6.1p1-29.el7 release, openssh can't be installed without selinux-policy. This is a regression against rhel-7.2 where openssh package doesn't require selinux-policy at all.

The problem is in this patch:

 %if %{WITH_SELINUX}
+Requires: selinux-policy >= 3.13.1-92
 Requires: libselinux >= 1.27.7

Given that openssh is always compiled with SELinux support, it brings a hard requirement on selinux-policy. However, openssh can be used without SELinux and selinux-policy. I believe that the correct change would be:


 %if %{WITH_SELINUX}
-Requires: selinux-policy >= 3.13.1-92
+Conflicts: selinux-policy < 3.13.1-92
 Requires: libselinux >= 1.27.7
Comment 4 Jakub Jelen 2016-09-06 05:23:47 EDT
Related Fedora Packaging Guidelines (that I missed) for future reference:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Conflicts#Optional_Functionality
Comment 9 errata-xmlrpc 2016-11-03 16:20:42 EDT
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2588.html

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.