Bug 1373638 - [RFE] Collect the available verbs within OpenShift
Summary: [RFE] Collect the available verbs within OpenShift
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: OpenShift Container Platform
Classification: Red Hat
Component: RFE
Version: 3.3.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: Michal Fojtik
QA Contact: Johnny Liu
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-09-06 20:16 UTC by Eric Jones
Modified: 2017-03-08 18:43 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-01-18 12:53:38 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2017:0066 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 3.4 RPM Release Advisory 2017-01-18 17:23:26 UTC

Description Eric Jones 2016-09-06 20:16:42 UTC
- What is the nature and description of the request? 
As a cluster admin I require the ability to list all of the verbs that are available to a user.

- Why does the customer need this? (List the business requirements here) 
Because the only way to currently see the full list of verbs is to visit the documentation.

- How would the customer like to achieve this? (List the functional requirements here) 
oc get verbs (or equivalent)

- For each functional requirement listed, specify how Red Hat and the customer can test to confirm the requirement is successfully implemented.
oc get verbs (or equivalent) 

- Is there already an existing RFE upstream or in Red Hat Bugzilla?
Not that I could find.

- List any affected packages or components.
OpenShift API

Comment 4 errata-xmlrpc 2017-01-18 12:53:38 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2017:0066


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.