Bug 1373663 - [4.0.z] RHEV-H should include Gluster packages that support RHGS 3.1.3 - bz#1372038
Summary: [4.0.z] RHEV-H should include Gluster packages that support RHGS 3.1.3 - bz#1...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager
Classification: Red Hat
Component: rhev-hypervisor-ng
Version: 3.6.8
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Linux
high
high
Target Milestone: ovirt-4.0.4
: ---
Assignee: Fabian Deutsch
QA Contact: cshao
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 1372038
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-09-06 22:03 UTC by Marina Kalinin
Modified: 2019-12-16 06:39 UTC (History)
24 users (show)

Fixed In Version: 4.0.4
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of: 1373661
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-09-28 22:19:05 UTC
oVirt Team: Node
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2016:1964 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE redhat-virtualization-host bug fix and enhancement update for RHV 4.0.4 2016-09-29 02:04:15 UTC

Description Marina Kalinin 2016-09-06 22:03:54 UTC 
Need to consume bz#1372038 in RHEV-H 3.6.z and 4.0.z to contain the latest gluster client packages.

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1373661 +++
Comment 1 cshao 2016-09-22 03:11:18 UTC 
Test version:
redhat-virtualization-host-4.0-20160919.0
imgbased-0.8.5-0.1.el7ev.noarch 

# rpm -qa | grep glusterfs
glusterfs-cli-3.7.9-12.el7.x86_64
glusterfs-3.7.9-12.el7.x86_64
glusterfs-client-xlators-3.7.9-12.el7.x86_64
glusterfs-fuse-3.7.9-12.el7.x86_64
glusterfs-rdma-3.7.9-12.el7.x86_64
glusterfs-libs-3.7.9-12.el7.x86_64
glusterfs-api-3.7.9-12.el7.x86_64
# 

Test result:
RHVH  contain the above 7 gluster client packages but lacked "glusterfs-devel", actually the vintage hypervisor has this package, please see bug 1373661 #c5.

Hi Fabian,

Is this necessary?
Comment 2 SATHEESARAN 2016-09-22 06:54:26 UTC 
For the worth of information, glusterfs-devel package is not required anywhere.
I am not sure, how that is available with vintage RHEV-H
Comment 3 Fabian Deutsch 2016-09-22 09:04:15 UTC 
The package was not explicitly requested, thus I don't see a need for it.
Comment 4 cshao 2016-09-22 11:07:23 UTC 
Verify this bug according #c1 & #c3.
Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2016-09-28 22:19:05 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-1964.html
Comment 7 Marina Kalinin 2016-10-21 15:28:02 UTC 
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016:1964
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.