Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

For bugs related to Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 product line. The current stable release is 3.9. For Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 and above, please visit Red Hat JIRA https://issues.redhat.com/secure/CreateIssue!default.jspa?pid=12332745 to report new issues.

Bug 137409

Summary:	The reiserfs files system is not supported on this kernel
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3	Reporter:	Srikanth <srikanth.venkataraman>
Component:	kernel	Assignee:	Dave Jones <davej>
Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE	QA Contact:	Brian Brock <bbrock>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	3.0	CC:	petrides, pfrields, riel, shillman
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	i686
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2004-10-29 00:16:46 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Srikanth 2004-10-28 10:41:55 UTC

Description of problem: When trying to mount the device having 
reiserfs the kernel reported that it this fs is not supported by the 
kernel. Even if the kernel was rebuild with reiserfs modular support. 
can u plz figure out problem 


 Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
 
AS 3 2.4.20-21.EL

How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1. compile the kernel with reiserfs moudlar support 
2. format a device to reiserfs  
3. try to mount it
  
Actual results:
This file system is not supported

Expected results:


Additional info:

The mount is successful with force mounting .
But the umount able to unmount with errors
The utility which was used to create reiserfs was reiserfsprogs-
3.6.17.tar . This utility was obtained from www.namesys.com

Comment 2 Dave Jones 2004-10-29 00:16:46 UTC

Reiserfs is not supported in RHEL3.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 126342 ***