Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0. The upgrade date is tentatively scheduled for 2 December 2018, pending final testing and feedback.
Bug 1374450 - Compliance check history isn't shown if compliance policy is unconditional
Compliance check history isn't shown if compliance policy is unconditional
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Product: Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Control (Show other bugs)
5.6.0
All All
medium Severity medium
: GA
: 5.6.2
Assigned To: Lucy Fu
Dmitry Misharov
control:ui
: ZStream
Depends On: 1369488
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2016-09-08 13:22 EDT by Satoe Imaishi
Modified: 2016-10-04 10:36 EDT (History)
6 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version: 5.6.2.0
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Previously, compliance check history wasn't shown if the compliance policy was unconditional. This occurred because a compliance detail record is required to display the compliance check history. With this fix, CloudForms now creates a compliance detail record for unconditional compliance policies, and the history is shown.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 1369488
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-10-04 10:36:23 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: Unknown


Attachments (Terms of Use)


External Trackers
Tracker ID Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2016:1996 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Important: CFME 4.1 bug fixes and enhancement update 2016-10-04 14:26:13 EDT

  None (edit)
Comment 2 Dmitry Misharov 2016-09-14 08:42:39 EDT
I still can reproduce the issue. Tested on 5.6.2.0.20160913114355_70e9086. Compliance status and history is not shown in the web ui after compliance checking if a compliance policy is unconditional.
Comment 3 Lucy Fu 2016-09-14 09:15:18 EDT
Dmitry,

Can I take a look at your testing environment? 
Please send me the credentials of your server, if possible.
Comment 5 Dmitry Misharov 2016-09-14 09:21:51 EDT
Sorry, Lucy it was a mistake. The bug is verified in 5.6.2.0.20160913114355_70e9086
Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2016-10-04 10:36:23 EDT
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1996.html

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.