Spec URL: http://www.sentolavita.com/pkgs/lv2-ir-plugins.spec SRPM URL: http://www.sentolavita.com/pkgs/lv2-ir-plugins-1.3.2-1.fc24.src.rpm Description: IR is a low-latency, realtime, high performance signal convolver especially for creating reverb effects. Supports impulse responses with 1, 2 or 4 channels, in any soundfile format supported by libsndfile. Fedora Account System Username: tartina Link to successful koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=15543150 I need a sponsor
There was an old review request for this package, see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=788717 it was closed because of f16 eol.
It's been a mistake to file the bug 788717 review request for F16. All reviews are filed for "Version: Rawhide". It has been like that forever and hasn't changed.
Spec URL: http://www.sentolavita.com/pkgs/lv2-ir-plugins.spec SRPM URL: http://www.sentolavita.com/pkgs/lv2-ir-plugins-1.3.2-2.fc24.src.rpm Modified real time priority to match Jack's default value Minor fixes
*** This is an unofficial review *** Quick take: 1) You don't need to specify gcc as a build dependency 2) The incorrect-fsf-address errors from rpmlint should be reported upstream. 3) There are two unversioned libraries included - pretty sure these ought to be moved to a devel package based on: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Shared_Libraries but I could be mistaken. 4) Fedora-review showed a build failure - the koji build you linked to is for Fedora 24. You have to make sure it builds on 25 and Rawhide as well, and speaking from experience, that can be a fun journey. I'd say work on those, and then we'll see where we stand. The SPEC file looks good btw. You can review the stuff below if you want as well. Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: ======= - Package installs properly. Note: Installation errors (see attachment) See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines - All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. Note: These BR are not needed: gcc-c++ See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2 ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [ ]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [ ]: Package contains no static executables. [ ]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see attachment). Verify they are not in ld path. [x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [ ]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [ ]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "GPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)", "LGPL (v2.1 or later)", "LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)", "Unknown or generated". 4 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/jwallace/1374510-lv2-ir- plugins/licensecheck.txt [ ]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [ ]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [ ]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [ ]: Changelog in prescribed format. [ ]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [ ]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [ ]: Development files must be in a -devel package [ ]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [ ]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [ ]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [ ]: Package does not generate any conflict. [ ]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [ ]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [ ]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [ ]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [ ]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [ ]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [ ]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [ ]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 2 files. [ ]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [ ]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [ ]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [ ]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in lv2-ir- plugins-debuginfo [ ]: Package functions as described. [ ]: Latest version is packaged. [ ]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [ ]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified. [ ]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [ ]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [ ]: %check is present and all tests pass. [ ]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [!]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: Mock build failed See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#rpmlint [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Installation errors ------------------- INFO: mock.py version 1.2.21 starting (python version = 3.5.1)... Start: init plugins INFO: selinux enabled Finish: init plugins Start: run Start: chroot init INFO: calling preinit hooks INFO: enabled root cache INFO: enabled dnf cache Start: cleaning dnf metadata Finish: cleaning dnf metadata Mock Version: 1.2.21 INFO: Mock Version: 1.2.21 Finish: chroot init INFO: installing package(s): /home/jwallace/1374510-lv2-ir-plugins/results/lv2-ir-plugins-debuginfo-1.3.2-2.fc26.x86_64.rpm /home/jwallace/1374510-lv2-ir-plugins/results/lv2-ir-plugins-1.3.2-2.fc26.x86_64.rpm ERROR: Command failed. See logs for output. # /usr/bin/dnf --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/ --releasever 26 --disableplugin=local --setopt=deltarpm=false install /home/jwallace/1374510-lv2-ir-plugins/results/lv2-ir-plugins-debuginfo-1.3.2-2.fc26.x86_64.rpm /home/jwallace/1374510-lv2-ir-plugins/results/lv2-ir-plugins-1.3.2-2.fc26.x86_64.rpm --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts Rpmlint ------- Checking: lv2-ir-plugins-1.3.2-2.fc26.x86_64.rpm lv2-ir-plugins-debuginfo-1.3.2-2.fc26.x86_64.rpm lv2-ir-plugins-1.3.2-2.fc26.src.rpm lv2-ir-plugins.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) realtime -> mealtime, real time, real-time lv2-ir-plugins.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) convolver -> converter, convener, converse lv2-ir-plugins.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US realtime -> mealtime, real time, real-time lv2-ir-plugins.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US convolver -> converter, convener, converse lv2-ir-plugins.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US reverb -> revere, revers, revert lv2-ir-plugins.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US soundfile -> sound file, sound-file, soundless lv2-ir-plugins.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libsndfile -> landfill lv2-ir-plugins.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/licenses/lv2-ir-plugins/COPYING lv2-ir-plugins-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/ir.lv2-1.3.2/ir.h lv2-ir-plugins-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/ir.lv2-1.3.2/ir_modeind.cc lv2-ir-plugins-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/ir.lv2-1.3.2/ir_modeind.h lv2-ir-plugins-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/ir.lv2-1.3.2/ir_utils.h lv2-ir-plugins-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/ir.lv2-1.3.2/ir_meter.cc lv2-ir-plugins-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/ir.lv2-1.3.2/ir_gui.cc lv2-ir-plugins-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/ir.lv2-1.3.2/ir_wavedisplay.cc lv2-ir-plugins-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/ir.lv2-1.3.2/ir_utils.cc lv2-ir-plugins-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/ir.lv2-1.3.2/ir_meter.h lv2-ir-plugins-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/ir.lv2-1.3.2/ir_wavedisplay.h lv2-ir-plugins-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/ir.lv2-1.3.2/ir.cc lv2-ir-plugins.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) realtime -> mealtime, real time, real-time lv2-ir-plugins.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) convolver -> converter, convener, converse lv2-ir-plugins.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US realtime -> mealtime, real time, real-time lv2-ir-plugins.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US convolver -> converter, convener, converse lv2-ir-plugins.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US reverb -> revere, revers, revert lv2-ir-plugins.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US soundfile -> sound file, sound-file, soundless lv2-ir-plugins.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libsndfile -> landfill 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 12 errors, 14 warnings. Requires -------- lv2-ir-plugins (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): libatk-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libcairo.so.2()(64bit) libfontconfig.so.1()(64bit) libfreetype.so.6()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgio-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgthread-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libpango-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libpangocairo-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libpangoft2-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) libsamplerate.so.0()(64bit) libsamplerate.so.0(libsamplerate.so.0.0)(64bit) libsndfile.so.1()(64bit) libsndfile.so.1(libsndfile.so.1.0)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.8)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.9)(64bit) libzita-convolver.so.3()(64bit) lv2 rtld(GNU_HASH) lv2-ir-plugins-debuginfo (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): Provides -------- lv2-ir-plugins: lv2-ir-plugins lv2-ir-plugins(x86-64) lv2-ir-plugins-debuginfo: lv2-ir-plugins-debuginfo lv2-ir-plugins-debuginfo(x86-64) Unversioned so-files -------------------- lv2-ir-plugins: /usr/lib64/lv2/ir.lv2/ir.so lv2-ir-plugins: /usr/lib64/lv2/ir.lv2/ir_gui.so Source checksums ---------------- https://github.com/tomszilagyi/ir.lv2/archive/1.3.2.tar.gz#/ir.lv2-1.3.2.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : e17cd9be6d648de9b38e4a36d69394a55e3a776e5d7d99ab51d8e0c7c8ff4a6f CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : e17cd9be6d648de9b38e4a36d69394a55e3a776e5d7d99ab51d8e0c7c8ff4a6f Generated by fedora-review 0.6.1 (f03e4e7) last change: 2016-05-02 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1374510 -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api, C/C++ Disabled plugins: Java, Python, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R, PHP Disabled flags: EXARCH, DISTTAG, EPEL5, BATCH, EPEL6
Spec URL: http://www.sentolavita.com/pkgs/lv2-ir-plugins.spec SRPM URL: http://www.sentolavita.com/pkgs/lv2-ir-plugins-1.3.2-3.fc24.src.rpm Link to successful koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=16693743 Thanks for your review. 1. According to this wiki http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:C_and_C%2B%2B we have to specify BR for gcc or g++, I also asked on IRC and they confirmed that. 2. I have patched the incorrect FSF address and I made a pull request on github to notify upstream of this problem (https://github.com/tomszilagyi/ir.lv2/pull/1) 3. This is a plugin, so I think versioning is not required, see Packaging Guidelines where it says (so this is not needed for plugins, drivers, etc.), no other LV2 plugins use versioned library sonames, see for example http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/lv2-mdaEPiano.git/tree/lv2-mdaEPiano.spec, and no ldconfig is called after installation. 4. I made another koji build and it succeeded, see the link above, if you have problems please post the build logs somewhere so I can have a look.
1. You appear to be right :o Learn something new every day. 2. Awesome 3. Sounds good 4. If it builds on koji, that's sufficient for me. Not sure why Fedora-review is failing, but it's almost certainly the tool and not the package. I don't see any further issues. Good luck :)
Upstream has merged the incorrect FSF address patch (https://github.com/tomszilagyi/ir.lv2/pull/1), so the next release will correctly report the FSF address.
Spec URL: http://www.sentolavita.com/pkgs/lv2-ir-plugins.spec SRPM URL: http://www.sentolavita.com/pkgs/lv2-ir-plugins-1.3.3-1.fc25.src.rpm Upgrade to version 1.3.3 Use hardened LDFLAGS Link to successful koji build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=17109083
Nice work Guido! Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see attachment). Verify they are not in ld path. [x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "LGPL (v2.1 or later)", "LGPL (v2 or later)", "GPL (v2 or later)", "Unknown or generated". 7 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/fale/Fedora/02_live/1374510-lv2-ir-plugins/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 2 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in lv2-ir- plugins-debuginfo [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [!]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s). Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: lv2-ir-plugins-1.3.3-1.fc25.x86_64.rpm lv2-ir-plugins-debuginfo-1.3.3-1.fc25.x86_64.rpm lv2-ir-plugins-1.3.3-1.fc25.src.rpm lv2-ir-plugins.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) convolver -> converter, convener, converse lv2-ir-plugins.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US convolver -> converter, convener, converse lv2-ir-plugins.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US reverb -> revere, revers, revert lv2-ir-plugins.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libsndfile -> landfill lv2-ir-plugins.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) convolver -> converter, convener, converse lv2-ir-plugins.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US convolver -> converter, convener, converse lv2-ir-plugins.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US reverb -> revere, revers, revert lv2-ir-plugins.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libsndfile -> landfill 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 8 warnings. Rpmlint (debuginfo) ------------------- Checking: lv2-ir-plugins-debuginfo-1.3.3-1.fc25.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- lv2-ir-plugins.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) convolver -> converter, convener, converse lv2-ir-plugins.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US convolver -> converter, convener, converse lv2-ir-plugins.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US reverb -> revere, revers, revert lv2-ir-plugins.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libsndfile -> landfill 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. Requires -------- lv2-ir-plugins (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): libatk-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libcairo.so.2()(64bit) libfontconfig.so.1()(64bit) libfreetype.so.6()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgio-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgthread-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libpango-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libpangocairo-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libpangoft2-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) libsamplerate.so.0()(64bit) libsamplerate.so.0(libsamplerate.so.0.0)(64bit) libsndfile.so.1()(64bit) libsndfile.so.1(libsndfile.so.1.0)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.8)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.9)(64bit) libzita-convolver.so.3()(64bit) lv2 rtld(GNU_HASH) lv2-ir-plugins-debuginfo (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): Provides -------- lv2-ir-plugins: lv2-ir-plugins lv2-ir-plugins(x86-64) lv2-ir-plugins-debuginfo: lv2-ir-plugins-debuginfo lv2-ir-plugins-debuginfo(x86-64) Unversioned so-files -------------------- lv2-ir-plugins: /usr/lib64/lv2/ir.lv2/ir.so lv2-ir-plugins: /usr/lib64/lv2/ir.lv2/ir_gui.so Source checksums ---------------- https://github.com/tomszilagyi/ir.lv2/archive/1.3.3.tar.gz#/ir.lv2-1.3.3.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : fff1ca05715fed8f049a26003bad1b3fc378f8a2b25af73981eafe99568fda0c CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : fff1ca05715fed8f049a26003bad1b3fc378f8a2b25af73981eafe99568fda0c Generated by fedora-review 0.6.1 (f03e4e7) last change: 2016-05-02 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1374510 Buildroot used: fedora-25-x86_64 Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api, C/C++ Disabled plugins: Java, Python, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R, PHP Disabled flags: EXARCH, DISTTAG, EPEL5, BATCH, EPEL6
Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/lv2-ir-plugins
lv2-ir-plugins-1.3.3-1.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-fc1534fb7d
lv2-ir-plugins-1.3.3-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-fc1534fb7d
lv2-ir-plugins-1.3.3-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.