Bug 1376001 - Review Request: python-flufl-lock - NFS-safe file locking with timeouts for POSIX systems
Summary: Review Request: python-flufl-lock - NFS-safe file locking with timeouts for P...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-09-14 12:33 UTC by Aurelien Bompard
Modified: 2016-10-18 11:30 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-10-18 11:30:25 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
zbyszek: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Aurelien Bompard 2016-09-14 12:33:57 UTC
Spec URL: https://abompard.fedorapeople.org/reviews/flufl.lock/python-flufl.lock.spec
SRPM URL: https://abompard.fedorapeople.org/reviews/flufl.lock/python-flufl.lock-2.4.1-1.fc23.src.rpm
Description:
The flufl.lock library provides an NFS-safe file-based locking algorithm
influenced by the GNU/Linux "open(2)" manpage, under the description of the
"O_EXCL" option.

Fedora Account System Username: abompard

Comment 1 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek 2016-10-05 03:38:45 UTC
"." should be replaced with "-" in the package name [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Naming?rd=Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Separators].

You can replace the second and subsequent Summary texts with %{summary}, no need to repeat.

Looks good otherwise.

Comment 2 Aurelien Bompard 2016-10-05 09:05:08 UTC
I renamed the package, and use macros for the summary and description. Thanks.

Spec URL: https://abompard.fedorapeople.org/reviews/flufl.lock/python-flufl-lock.spec
SRPM URL: https://abompard.fedorapeople.org/reviews/flufl.lock/python-flufl-lock-2.4.1-1.fc23.src.rpm

Comment 3 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek 2016-10-09 14:10:22 UTC
+ /usr/bin/python2 setup.py test
running test
running egg_info
writing flufl.lock.egg-info/PKG-INFO
writing namespace_packages to flufl.lock.egg-info/namespace_packages.txt
writing top-level names to flufl.lock.egg-info/top_level.txt
writing dependency_links to flufl.lock.egg-info/dependency_links.txt
reading manifest file 'flufl.lock.egg-info/SOURCES.txt'
reading manifest template 'MANIFEST.in'
warning: no previously-included files found matching '.gitignore'
writing manifest file 'flufl.lock.egg-info/SOURCES.txt'
running build_ext
test_retries (flufl.lock.tests.test_lockfile.ErrnoRetryTests) ... FAIL
test_retry_errno_api (flufl.lock.tests.test_lockfile.ErrnoRetryTests) ... ok
/home/zbyszek/rpmbuild/BUILD/flufl.lock-2.4.1/flufl/lock/README.rst
Doctest: README.rst ... ok
/home/zbyszek/rpmbuild/BUILD/flufl.lock-2.4.1/flufl/lock/docs/using.rst
Doctest: using.rst ... ok

======================================================================
FAIL: test_retries (flufl.lock.tests.test_lockfile.ErrnoRetryTests)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/zbyszek/rpmbuild/BUILD/flufl.lock-2.4.1/flufl/lock/tests/test_lockfile.py", line 103, in test_retries
    self.assertEqual(self._retry_count, 3)
AssertionError: 0 != 3

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ran 4 tests in 28.614s

FAILED (failures=1)

This is in a local build on F25.

Nevertheless, it builds find in F25, rawhide mock: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=16015449,  http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=16015457.

rpmlint says:
python2-flufl-lock.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US manpage -> manage, man page, man-page
python3-flufl-lock.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US manpage -> manage, man page, man-page
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
"man page" is a better spelling.


Similarly to python-flufl-bounce, there's a bunch of sphinx files in site-packages.

Comment 4 Aurelien Bompard 2016-10-09 15:50:41 UTC
I fixed those issues, thanks. I can't reproduce the test failure though.

Spec URL: https://abompard.fedorapeople.org/reviews/flufl.lock/python-flufl-lock.spec
SRPM URL: https://abompard.fedorapeople.org/reviews/flufl.lock/python-flufl-lock-2.4.1-1.fc23.src.rpm

Comment 5 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek 2016-10-10 01:47:03 UTC
What kernel are you using? I have 
4.8.0-0.rc7.git0.1.fc25.x86_64 here, it might be related. The strange thing is that only python2 fails (python-2.7.12-6.fc25.x86_64).

conf.py should be deleted from site-packages too.

+ package name is OK
+ latest version
+ license is acceptable (LGPLv3+)
+ license is specified correctly
+ python packaging template is used
+ %python_provide is used
+ provides/requires are OK
+ builds and installs OK

Package is APPROVED.

Comment 6 Patrick Uiterwijk 2016-10-11 12:27:14 UTC
Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-flufl-lock

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2016-10-14 04:55:44 UTC
python-flufl-lock-2.4.1-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-91bdd97aca

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2016-10-18 11:30:25 UTC
python-flufl-lock-2.4.1-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.