Hide Forgot
SELinux is preventing /usr/bin/python2.7 from using the signal access on a process. ***** Plugin catchall (100. confidence) suggests ************************** If you believe that python2.7 should be allowed signal access on processes labeled postfix_postdrop_t by default. Then you should report this as a bug. You can generate a local policy module to allow this access. Do allow this access for now by executing: # grep fail2ban-server /var/log/audit/audit.log | audit2allow -M mypol # semodule -i mypol.pp Additional Information: Source Context system_u:system_r:fail2ban_t:s0 Target Context system_u:system_r:postfix_postdrop_t:s0 Target Objects Unknown [ process ] Source fail2ban-server Source Path /usr/bin/python2.7 Port <Unknown> Host server.interlinx.bc.ca Source RPM Packages Target RPM Packages Policy RPM selinux-policy-3.13.1-60.el7_2.9.noarch Selinux Enabled True Policy Type targeted Enforcing Mode Enforcing Host Name server.interlinx.bc.ca Platform Linux server.interlinx.bc.ca 3.10.0-327.28.3.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Thu Aug 18 19:05:49 UTC 2016 x86_64 x86_64 Alert Count 33 First Seen 2016-06-27 23:23:49 EDT Last Seen 2016-09-18 00:53:32 EDT Local ID b1eecb90-3c8b-4024-9334-024e301c3e3b Raw Audit Messages type=AVC msg=audit(1474174412.129:3186): avc: denied { signal } for pid=15268 comm="fail2ban-server" scontext=system_u:system_r:fail2ban_t:s0 tcontext=system_u:system_r:postfix_postdrop_t:s0 tclass=process type=AVC msg=audit(1474174412.129:3186): avc: denied { signal } for pid=15268 comm="fail2ban-server" scontext=system_u:system_r:fail2ban_t:s0 tcontext=system_u:system_r:system_mail_t:s0 tclass=process type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1474174412.129:3186): arch=x86_64 syscall=kill success=yes exit=0 a0=ffff8ecb a1=f a2=0 a3=0 items=0 ppid=1 pid=15268 auid=4294967295 uid=0 gid=0 euid=0 suid=0 fsuid=0 egid=0 sgid=0 fsgid=0 tty=(none) ses=4294967295 comm=fail2ban-server exe=2F7573722F62696E2F707974686F6E322E373B3537646437333764202864656C6574656429 subj=system_u:system_r:fail2ban_t:s0 key=(null) Hash: fail2ban-server,fail2ban_t,postfix_postdrop_t,process,signal
Looks like this is a duplicate of 1350894. I wonder why abrt didn't find that. In any case this or the other should be closed as DUPLICATE.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1350894 ***