Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because
the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
I'm replicating it on my host using a much longer test period (e.g. -t 1000).
The problem is that with very large captures, we stress a lot the storage and the kernel activity to flush the block device are not accounted to the netsniff-ng process, but to some worker thread.
Increasing the number of netsniff-ng processes decreases the change for this to happen, because introduce more per process 'caching'.
I think this behavior is not a bug, wdyt?
Can you please verify that increasing the iperf run time you can reproduce the issue more frequently even in presence of may netsniff-ng processes?
Thanks,
Paolo
paolo,
sorry, I missed your comment before, since we are in pegas1.0 snapshot4 testing phase, now I have no machines with 10 NIC in my hand. the machines may be available after 1-2 days or more longer.
I don't mind you close the bug status now, if there is still a problem, I'll contact you and reopen it.