Bug 1377889 - Azure : Instance name restriction should be shown in UI when deploying template for Azure
Summary: Azure : Instance name restriction should be shown in UI when deploying templa...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Providers
Version: 5.6.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
medium
medium
Target Milestone: GA
: 5.8.0
Assignee: Daniel Berger
QA Contact: Jeff Teehan
URL:
Whiteboard: provider:ui:azure
Depends On:
Blocks: 1402528
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-09-20 22:41 UTC by Shveta
Modified: 2017-06-12 16:36 UTC (History)
10 users (show)

Fixed In Version: 5.8.0.0
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
: 1402528 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-06-12 16:36:36 UTC
Category: Feature
Cloudforms Team: Azure
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Shveta 2016-09-20 22:41:57 UTC
Description of problem:


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create a catalog item for Azure 
2. if the Instance name provided is more than 15 chars or has special chars ,the request fails.
3. It will be good to show this restriction while creating the item

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 3 Jeff Teehan 2016-10-04 23:48:29 UTC
I'll take this one too.  Especially since the rules keep changing.

Comment 7 Daniel Berger 2016-12-01 18:02:18 UTC
https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq/pull/12947

Comment 8 Jeff Teehan 2016-12-01 18:29:06 UTC
Added new test case id above - I'm checking the 1 character vm name now.

Comment 10 Jeff Teehan 2017-04-26 17:32:57 UTC
This bug is the same as the password bug, which is to say it's two bugs.  One is fixed in basic lifecycle provision, this one, but another bug needs to be fixed for the azure provision template JSON.

Comment 11 Jeff Teehan 2017-04-27 17:47:08 UTC
I'm going to rename these and move them to verified.  Then open up a consolidate bug for Bill to update the template with these validations.  There should have been two bugs for this issue, but since Dan already submitted commits to fix the none-orchestration UI.

This is working otherwise when LifeCycle deploying templates.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.